The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducibility of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Across Three Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Systems
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To investigate the reproducibility of choroidal thickness measurements in normal subjects on three Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SDOCT) instruments, Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, USA), Heidelberg Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and Optovue RTVue (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA). Design Cross-sectional non-interventional study Participants Images were obtained in 28 eyes of 28 healthy undilated volunteers without ocular pathology in a clinical setting. Methods All subjects were imaged on the fovea using Cirrus HD 1-line raster, Spectralis enhanced depth imaging and RTVue retina-cross. Main Outcome Measures The choroid was measured subfoveally, 750 μm temporal and 750 μm nasal to the fovea. All measurements were performed by 2 independent observers. Two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni's post-test, Pearson correlation and the Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare measurements. Results The group of 28 subjects consisted of 7 men and 21 women, with an average age of 35.2 years (range, 23 to 64 years). A two way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test revealed no significant difference in the average subfoveal choroidal thickness (P >0.05) between systems for any location: subfoveally, 750μm temporal and 750 μm nasal to the fovea. The measurements of choroidal thickness from any pair of three instruments (Cirrus vs. Spectralis, Cirrus vs. RTVue, Spectralis vs. RTVue) were also strongly correlated. The Pearson correlation between all two system pairs of the three systems was greater than 0.9 p <0.0001. The 95% limits of agreement between four choroidal thickness measurements between Cirrus and RTVue were +11.21% to -13.57% (Bias -1.17), between Spectralis and RTVue +10.85% to -12.45% (Bias -0.80) and between Cirrus and Spectralis +12.81% to -13.33% (Bias -0.25). Conclusions In our population of young healthy adults with normal vision, there was good reproducibility between choroidal thickness measurements of images acquired with Cirrus, Spectralis and RTVue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhanced Depth Imaging Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Spaide, R. F., Koizumi, H., & Pozonni, M. C. (2008) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.032 · Cited by 2,180
A Pilot Study of Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography of the Choroid in Normal Eyes
Margolis, R., & Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.008 · Cited by 1,344
IMAMURA, Y., FUJIWARA, T., MARGOLIS, R., & SPAIDE, R. F. (2009) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0b013e3181be0a83 · Cited by 955
Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography of the Choroid in Highly Myopic Eyes
Fujiwara, T., Imamura, Y., Margolis, R., Slakter, J. S., & Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.029 · Cited by 823
Choroidal Thickness in Normal Eyes Measured Using Cirrus HD Optical Coherence Tomography
Manjunath, V., Taha, M., Fujimoto, J. G., & Duker, J. S. (2010) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.018 · Cited by 490
Self-citationWolf-Schnurrbusch, U. E. K., Ceklic, L., Brinkmann, C. K., Iliev, M. E., Frey, M., Rothenbuehler, S. P., Enzmann, V., & Wolf, S. (2009) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2970 · Cited by 424
Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.010 · Cited by 373
Central serous chorioretinopathy: an update on pathogenesis and treatment
Gemenetzi, M., De Salvo, G., & Lotery, A. J. (2010) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2010.130 · Cited by 325
Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.005 · Cited by 307
Optical Coherence Tomography Enhanced Depth Imaging of Choroidal Tumors
Torres, V. L. L., Brugnoni, N., Kaiser, P. K., & Singh, A. D. (2011) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.09.028 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness: The Beijing Eye Study
Wei, W. B., Xu, L., Jonas, J. B., Shao, L., Du, K. F., Wang, S., Chen, C. X., Xu, J., Wang, Y. X., Zhou, J. Q., et al. (2013) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.048 · Cited by 599
Optical coherence tomography – current and future applications
Adhi, M., & Duker, J. S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/icu.0b013e32835f8bf8 · Cited by 567
Self-citationOptical coherence tomography: Imaging of the choroid and beyond
Mrejen, S., & Spaide, R. F. (2013) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.001 · Cited by 477
A paradigm shift in imaging biomarkers in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Schmidt-Erfurth, U., & Waldstein, S. M. (2016) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.007 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- Branchini, L., Regatieri, C. V., Flores-Moreno, I., Baumann, B., Fujimoto, J. G., & Duker, J. S.
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-123
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104323245
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 21.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Across Three Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.002
- The paper
- Branchini, L., Regatieri, C. V., Flores-Moreno, I., Baumann, B., Fujimoto, J. G., & Duker, J. S. (2012). Reproducibility of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Across Three Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Systems. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.