A multicenter analysis of the ophthalmic knowledge assessment program and American Board of Ophthalmology written qualifying examination performance
Abstract
Objective To compare the performance on the American Board of Ophthalmology Written Qualifying Examination (WQE) with the performance on step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and the Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) examination for residents in multiple residency programs.Design Comparative case series.Participants Fifteen residency programs with 339 total residents participated in this study. The data were extracted from the 5-year American Board of Ophthalmology report to each participating program in 2009 and included residency graduating classes from 2003 through 2007. Residents were included if data were available for the USMLE, OKAP examination in ophthalmology years 1 through 3, and the WQE score. Residents were excluded if one or more of the test scores were not available.Methods Two-sample t tests, logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the association of the various tests (USMLE, OKAP examination year 1, OKAP examination year 2, OKAP examination year 3, and maximum OKAP examination score) as a predictor for a passing or failing grade on the WQE.Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure of this study was first time pass rate for the WQE.Results Using ROC analysis, the OKAP examination taken at the third year of ophthalmology residency best predicted performance on the WQE. For the OKAP examination taken during the third year of residency, the probability of passing the WQE was at least 80% for a score of 35 or higher and at least 95% for a score of 72 or higher.Conclusions The OKAP examination, especially in the third year of residency, can be useful to residents to predict the likelihood of success on the high-stakes WQE examination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The BCSC and OphthoQuestions resources have been shown to be effective in studying for board examinations and linked to improved performance on OKAP.
“These resources have been shown to be effective in studying for board examinations and have been linked to improved performance on the standardized Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) examination, which is taken annually by ophthalmology residents in the United States and Canada.12,13”
From Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Managing the new mandate in resident education
Lee, A. G., & Carter, K. D. (2004) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.021 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationThe New competencies and their impact on resident training in ophthalmology
Lee, A. G. (2003) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.08.009 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, G. A., Bloom, J. N., Szczotka‐Flynn, L. B., Zauner, D., & Tomsak, R. L. (2010) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.056 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Correlating Factors to Resident Performance in an Ophthalmology Program
Catalano, R. A., & Jenkins, P. (1989) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32858-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
New Directions for the Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) Examination
Liesegang, T. J. (1994) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31365-0 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
First-Time Failure Rates of Candidates for Board Certification
O’Day, D. M. (2008) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.126.4.548 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP): A personal view
Rubin, M. L. (1988) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0039-6257(88)90176-2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology
Antaki, F., Touma, S., Milad, D., El-Khoury, J., & Duval, R. (2023) · Ophthalmology Science · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2023.100324 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Antaki, F., Touma, S., Milad, D., El-Khoury, J., & Duval, R. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.01.22.23284882 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Zafar, S., Wang, X., Srikumaran, D., Sikder, S., Ramulu, P., Boland, M. V., Singman, E., & Woreta, F. A. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1637-4 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, A. G., Oetting, T. A., Blomquist, P. H., Bradford, G., Culican, S. M., Kloek, C., Krishnan, C., Lauer, A. K., Levi, L., Naseri, A., Rubin, S. E., Scott, I. U., Tao, J., Tuli, S., Wright, M. M., WuDunn, D., & Zimmerman, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Houston Methodist (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- West Virginia University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Northwell Health (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1949-1953
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064188267
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Research to Prevent Blindness
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- USMLE Step 1, ophthalmology residency, ophthalmology residents
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Medical, Graduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Internship and Residency, Ophthalmology, ROC Curve, Societies, Medical, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review