Cited by 27Ophthalmology and Visual Health ResearchInnovations in Medical EducationMedical Education and Admissions

A multicenter analysis of the ophthalmic knowledge assessment program and American Board of Ophthalmology written qualifying examination performance

Lee, Andrew G., Oetting, Thomas A., Blomquist, Preston H., Bradford, Geoffrey, Culican, Susan M., Kloek, Carolyn, Krishnan, Chandrasekharan, Lauer, Andreas K. +9 more·2012·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective To compare the performance on the American Board of Ophthalmology Written Qualifying Examination (WQE) with the performance on step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and the Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) examination for residents in multiple residency programs.Design Comparative case series.Participants Fifteen residency programs with 339 total residents participated in this study. The data were extracted from the 5-year American Board of Ophthalmology report to each participating program in 2009 and included residency graduating classes from 2003 through 2007. Residents were included if data were available for the USMLE, OKAP examination in ophthalmology years 1 through 3, and the WQE score. Residents were excluded if one or more of the test scores were not available.Methods Two-sample t tests, logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the association of the various tests (USMLE, OKAP examination year 1, OKAP examination year 2, OKAP examination year 3, and maximum OKAP examination score) as a predictor for a passing or failing grade on the WQE.Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure of this study was first time pass rate for the WQE.Results Using ROC analysis, the OKAP examination taken at the third year of ophthalmology residency best predicted performance on the WQE. For the OKAP examination taken during the third year of residency, the probability of passing the WQE was at least 80% for a score of 35 or higher and at least 95% for a score of 72 or higher.Conclusions The OKAP examination, especially in the third year of residency, can be useful to residents to predict the likelihood of success on the high-stakes WQE examination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.010

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BCSC and OphthoQuestions resources have been shown to be effective in studying for board examinations and linked to improved performance on OKAP.

    “These resources have been shown to be effective in studying for board examinations and have been linked to improved performance on the standardized Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) examination, which is taken annually by ophthalmology residents in the United States and Canada.12,13”

    From Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, A. G., Oetting, T. A., Blomquist, P. H., Bradford, G., Culican, S. M., Kloek, C., Krishnan, C., Lauer, A. K., Levi, L., Naseri, A., Rubin, S. E., Scott, I. U., Tao, J., Tuli, S., Wright, M. M., WuDunn, D., & Zimmerman, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Houston Methodist (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
119
Issue
10
Pages
1949-1953
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064188267
Cited by
27
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Research to Prevent Blindness
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
USMLE Step 1, ophthalmology residency, ophthalmology residents
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Medical, Graduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Internship and Residency, Ophthalmology, ROC Curve, Societies, Medical, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review