Cited by 13Ophthalmology and Visual Health ResearchInnovations in Medical EducationMedical Education and Admissions

Resident and program characteristics that impact performance on the Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP)

Open access
Zafar, Sidra, Wang, Xueyang, Srikumaran, Divya, Sikder, Shameema, Ramulu, Pradeep, Boland, Michael V., Singman, Eric, Woreta, Fasika A.·2019·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine which resident and program characteristics correlate with ophthalmic knowledge, as assessed by resident Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) performance. METHODS: An online survey was sent in June 2017 to all US ophthalmology residents who took the OKAP in April 2017. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 13.8% (192/1387 residents). The mean respondent age was 30.4 years, and 57.3% were male. The mean [SD] self-reported 2017 OKAP percentile was 61.9 [26.7]. OKAP performance was found to have a significant positive correlation with greater number of hours spent/week studying for the OKAPs (p = 0.007), with use of online question banks (p < 0.001), with review sessions and/or lectures arranged by residency programs (p < 0.001), and with OKAP-specific didactics (p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, factors most predictive of residents scoring ≥75th percentile were, higher step 1 scores (OR = 2.48, [95% CI: 1.68-3.64, p < 0.001]), presence of incentives (OR = 2.75, [95% CI: 1.16-6.56, p = 0.022]), greater number of hours/week spent studying (OR = 1.09, [95% CI:1.01-1.17, p = 0.026]) and fewer hours spent in research 3 months prior to examination (OR = 1.08, [95% CI: 1.01-1.15, p = 0.020]. Lastly, residents less likely to depend on group study sessions as a learning method tended to score higher (OR = 3.40, [95% CI: 1.16-9.94, p = 0.026]). CONCLUSIONS: Programs wishing to improve resident OKAP scores might consider offering incentives, providing effective access to learning content e.g. online question banks, and adjusting the curriculum to highlight OKAP material. Step 1 scores may help educators identify residents who might be at risk of not performing as well on the OKAP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-019-1637-4

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BCSC and OphthoQuestions resources have been shown to be effective in studying for board examinations and linked to improved performance on OKAP.

    “These resources have been shown to be effective in studying for board examinations and have been linked to improved performance on the standardized Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) examination, which is taken annually by ophthalmology residents in the United States and Canada.12,13”

    From Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology (2023) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zafar, S., Wang, X., Srikumaran, D., Sikder, S., Ramulu, P., Boland, M. V., Singman, E., & Woreta, F. A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Woreta, Fasika A.
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2019-06-07
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
190-190
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948641588
Cited by
13
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
ophthalmology residency, residency program characteristics, online question bank, study habits, USMLE Step 1 scores, curriculum development, ophthalmology education, didactic sessions
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Ophthalmology, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review