The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Classification of Eyes with and without Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Open accessAbstract
Objective To define quantitative indicators for the presence of intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) via spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging of older adults. Design Evaluation of diagnostic test and technology. Participants and Controls One eye from 115 elderly subjects without AMD and 269 subjects with intermediate AMD from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) Ancillary SD-OCT Study. Methods We semiautomatically delineated the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and RPE drusen complex (RPEDC, the axial distance from the apex of the drusen and RPE layer to Bruch's membrane) and total retina (TR, the axial distance between the inner limiting and Bruch's membranes) boundaries. We registered and averaged the thickness maps from control subjects to generate a map of “normal” non-AMD thickness. We considered RPEDC thicknesses larger or smaller than 3 standard deviations from the mean as abnormal, indicating drusen or geographic atrophy (GA), respectively. We measured TR volumes, RPEDC volumes, and abnormal RPEDC thickening and thinning volumes for each subject. By using different combinations of these 4 disease indicators, we designed 5 automated classifiers for the presence of AMD on the basis of the generalized linear model regression framework. We trained and evaluated the performance of these classifiers using the leave-one-out method. Main Outcome Measures The range and topographic distribution of the RPEDC and TR thicknesses in a 5-mm diameter cylinder centered at the fovea. Results The most efficient method for separating AMD and control eyes required all 4 disease indicators. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for this classifier was >0.99. Overall neurosensory retinal thickening in eyes with AMD versus control eyes in our study contrasts with previous smaller studies. Conclusions We identified and validated efficient biometrics to distinguish AMD from normal eyes by analyzing the topographic distribution of normal and abnormal RPEDC thicknesses across a large atlas of eyes. We created an online atlas to share the 38 400 SD-OCT images in this study, their corresponding segmentations, and quantitative measurements. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
John Lu, Z. Q. (2010) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00646_6.x · Cited by 12,390
Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory
Sengijpta, S. K. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484391 · Cited by 11,076
Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing
Kay, S. (2001) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 3,642
Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
(2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102673 · Cited by 2,669
An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models.
Chang, P. C., & Dobson, A. J. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290548 · Cited by 2,509
Hageman, G. (2001) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00010-6 · Cited by 1,265
The Five-year Incidence and Progression of Age-related Maculopathy
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Jensen, S. C., & Meuer, S. M. (1997) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30368-6 · Cited by 1,135
A Simplified Severity Scale for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: AREDS Report No. 18
(2005) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.123.11.1570 · Cited by 807
Cited by
Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease
De Fauw, J., Ledsam, J. R., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Tomasev, N., Blackwell, S., Askham, H., Glorot, X., O’Donoghue, B., Visentin, D., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6 · Cited by 2,639
Artificial intelligence in retina
Schmidt-Erfurth, U., Sadeghipour, A., Gerendas, B. S., Waldstein, S. M., & Bogunović, H. (2018) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.07.004 · Cited by 779
Cuenca, N., Fernández-Sánchez, L., Campello, L., Maneu, V., De la Villa, P., Lax, P., & Pinilla, I. (2014) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.07.001 · Cited by 401
Zanzottera, E. C., Messinger, J. D., Ach, T., Smith, R. T., Freund, K. B., & Curcio, C. A. (2015) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16431 · Cited by 164
González-Gonzalo, C., Thee, E. F., Klaver, C. C. W., Lee, A. Y., Schlingemann, R. O., Tufail, A., Verbraak, F., & Sánchez, C. I. (2022) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101034 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Farsiu, S., Chiu, S. J., O'Connell, R. V., Folgar, F. A., Yuan, E., Izatt, J. A., & Toth, C. A.
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162-172
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001080026
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Classification of Eyes with and without Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration Using Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.013
- The paper
- Farsiu, S., Chiu, S. J., O'Connell, R. V., Folgar, F. A., Yuan, E., Izatt, J. A., & Toth, C. A. (2014). Quantitative Classification of Eyes with and without Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration Using Optical Coherence Tomography. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.