The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To both evaluate the frequency of eleven commonly cited barriers to optimal glaucoma medication adherence among glaucoma patients and identify barriers contributing to poor adherence. Design Prospective, cross-sectional survey. Participants 190 adults with glaucoma taking ≥1 glaucoma medication who received care in glaucoma clinics in Ann Arbor, MI and Baltimore, MD. Methods Participants completed a survey on demographic and disease characteristics, barriers to optimal glaucoma medication adherence, interest in an eye drop aid, and self-reported adherence (measured by the Morisky Adherence Scale). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed. Main Outcome Measures Frequency and number of barriers to adherence among both adherent and non-adherent patients. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals identifying barriers associated with poor adherence. Results 27% of the sample reported poor adherence. 61% of all participants cited multiple barriers and 10% cited a single barrier as impediments to optimal adherence. 29% of subjects cited no barriers, though only 13% of patients who cited no barriers were non-adherent. Among non-adherent patients, ≥31% cited each of the eleven barriers as important. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, revealed that the following barriers were associated with higher odds of non-adherence: decreased self-efficacy, OR = 4.7 [95% CI 2.2–9.7, p= < 0.0001]; difficulty instilling drops, OR = 2.3 [95% CI 1.1–4.9, p= 0.03]; forgetfulness, OR = 5.6 [95% CI 2.6–12.1, p= < 0.0001]; and difficulties with the medication schedule, OR = 2.9 [1.4–6.0, p= 0.006]. For each additional barrier cited as important, there was a 10% increased odds of being non-adherent, OR = 1.1 [95% CI 1.0–1.2, p= 0.01]. Conclusion Each of the eleven barriers was important to at least 30% of surveyed patients with poor adherence, with the majority identifying multiple barriers to adherence. Low self-efficacy, forgetfulness, and difficulty with drop administration and the medication schedule were all barriers associated with poor adherence. Interventions to improve medication adherence must address each patient’s unique set of barriers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Retracted: Predictive Validity of a Medication Adherence Measure in an Outpatient Setting
Morisky, D. E., Ang, A., Krousel‐Wood, M., & Ward, H. J. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x · Cited by 2,877
RetractedSelf-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,281
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020
Quigley, H. A. (2006) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 · Cited by 7,394
Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-reported Measure of Medication Adherence
Morisky, D. E., Green, L. W., & Levine, D. M. (1986) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007 · Cited by 5,317
Kass, M. A. (2002) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.701 · Cited by 3,705
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.
Quigley, H. A. (1996) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.389 · Cited by 2,998
Causes and Prevalence of Visual Impairment Among Adults in the UnitedStates
(2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.477 · Cited by 2,616
Cited by
Lavia, C., Dallorto, L., Maule, M., Ceccarelli, M., & Fea, A. M. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183142 · Cited by 455
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up
Gedde, S. J., Feuer, W. J., Shi, W., Lim, K. S., Barton, K., Goyal, S., Ahmed, I. I. K., Brandt, J., Gedde, S., Banitt, M., et al. (2018) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.003 · Cited by 322
Adherence to topical glaucoma therapy in patients attending virtual clinics
Cheng, K. K. W., Young, S. L., Donaldson, S., Malcolm, T. R., & Tatham, A. J. (2023) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02277-y · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman-Casey, P. A., Robin, A. L., Blachley, T., Farris, K., Heisler, M., Resnicow, K., & Lee, P. P.
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1308-1316
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1842399002
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 20.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.026
- The paper
- Newman-Casey, P. A., Robin, A. L., Blachley, T., Farris, K., Heisler, M., Resnicow, K., & Lee, P. P. (2015). The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.