Cited by 68Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome

Intravitreal Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Open access
Solomon, Sharon D., Lindsley, Kristina B., Krzystolik, Magdalena G., Vedula, Satyanarayana S., Hawkins, Barbara S.·2016·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Topic To summarize the relative effects of bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) and ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, Inc.), using findings from a Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group systematic review.Clinical relevance Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) is the most common cause of uncorrectable vision loss among the elderly in developed countries. Bevacizumab and ranibizumab are the most frequently used anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents injected intravitreally to treat NVAMD.Methods For this systematic review, we included only randomized controlled trials in which the 2 anti-VEGF agents had been compared directly. The primary outcome was 1-year gain in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥15 letters. We followed Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction, and data analyses. Relative effects of bevacizumab versus ranibizumab are presented as estimated risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results We identified 6 eligible randomized controlled trials with 2809 participants. The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters of BCVA by 1 year was similar for the 2 agents when the same regimens were compared (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.11). The mean change in BCVA from baseline also was similar (MD, -0.5 letter; 95% CI, -1.6 to +0.6). Other BCVA and quality of life outcomes were similar for the 2 agents. One-year treatment cost with ranibizumab was 5.1 and 25.5 times the cost for bevacizumab in the 2 largest trials. Ocular adverse events were uncommon (<1%), and rates were similar for the 2 agents.Conclusions We found no important difference in effectiveness or safety between bevacizumab and ranibizumab for NVAMD treatment, but there was a large cost difference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.002

Cites

22 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Review Manager (RevMan) [computer software]. Version 5.2 2012 The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Copenhagen

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solomon, S. D., Lindsley, K. B., Krzystolik, M. G., Vedula, S. S., & Hawkins, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
Corresponding author
Hawkins, Barbara S.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
70-77.e1
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2212725224
Cited by
68
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • National Eye Institute (EY020522, U01EY020522)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Keywords
neovascular age-related macular degeneration, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, intravitreal injection, anti-VEGF therapy, best-corrected visual acuity, visual acuity improvement, treatment costs, ocular adverse effects, quality of life
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Visual Acuity, Retinal Neovascularization, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Intravitreal Injections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review