Cited by 174Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesRetinal Diseases and Treatments

The Association between Vision Impairment and Incidence of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment

Shang, Xianwen, Zhu, Zhuoting, Wang, Wei, Ha, Jason, He, Mingguang·2021·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Topic The magnitude and direction of the association between vision impairment and incident dementia and cognitive impairment in prospective cohort studies was estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis. The global burden of dementia associated with vision impairment then was estimated. Clinical relevance Because a predominant proportion of vision impairment is preventable or treatable, investigating its association with dementia may help to identify an important modifiable factor for the prevention of dementia. Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar on September 15, 2020. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled using random-effects models and stratified analyses for subgroups representing different study characteristics. Publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots and the Egger test. The global burden of dementia associated with vision impairment was estimated based on the Global Burden of Disease Study data on the prevalence of dementia and vision impairment. Results In the meta-analysis of 14 prospective cohort studies with 6 204 827 participants and 171 888 dementia patients, the pooled RR associated with vision impairment was 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.60). In the meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies with 45 313 participants and 13 350 patients with cognitive impairment, the pooled RR was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.28-1.41). Stratified analyses showed that the associations of vision impairment…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.029

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vision impairment was associated with a pooled RR for dementia of 1.47 (1.36-1.60) in a meta-analysis of 14 prospective cohort studies including 6,204,827 older adults who were cognitively intact at baseline.

    “Vision impairment was associated with a pooled RR for dementia of 1.47 (1.36 -1.60 see figure 8).”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shang, X., Zhu, Z., Wang, W., Ha, J., & He, M.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Centre for Eye Research Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
He, Mingguang
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
128
Issue
8
Pages
1135-1149
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119938821
Cited by
174
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
visual impairment, dementia, cognitive impairment, dementia risk factors, modifiable risk factors, dementia prevention, economic inequality, older adults, vision screening
MeSH terms
Dementia, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Vision Disorders, Incidence, Persons with Visual Disabilities, Visually Impaired Persons, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review