Cited by 143Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Telemedicine and Dementia Care: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators

Open access
Yi, Julie S., Pittman, Corinne A., Price, Carrie L., Nieman, Carrie L., Oh, Esther S.·2021·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objectives An increasing reliance on telemedicine for older adults with cognitive impairment requires a better understanding of the barriers and facilitators for this unique patient population.Design The study team queried PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov on May 1, 2020, for studies in English published from January 2010 to May 2020.Setting and participants We conducted a systematic review of articles investigating the use of telemedicine among older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) that focused on the patient and care partner perspectives.Methods Telemedicine encounter purpose, technological requirements, and findings regarding sensory needs were extracted. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was applied for quality assessment.Results The search yielded 3551 abstracts, from which 90 articles were reviewed and 17 were included. The purpose of telemedicine encounters included routine care, cognitive assessment, and telerehabilitation. All studies reported successful implementation of telemedicine, supported by patient and care partner satisfaction, similar results on cognitive assessment and diagnosis compared to in-person visits, and improvement in outcome measures following rehabilitation. Sixteen studies relied on staff and care partners to navigate technologies. Six studies reported participants reporting difficulty hearing the provider during the telemedicine visits. Five studies excluded participants with visual or hearing impairment because of the potential difficulty of using telemedicine technology. No studies reported technological adaptations to account for sensory impairment.Conclusions and implications Telemedicine is well received among patients and care partners, but successful delivery incorporates support staff and the care partners to navigate technologies. The exclusion of older adults with sensory impairment, especially given that it is highly prevalent, in developing telemedicine systems may further exacerbate access to care in this population. Adapting technologies for sensory needs is critical to the advancement of accessible dementia care through telemedicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.03.015

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review of telehealth for dementia care, including routine care, cognitive assessment and rehabilitation, found that telehealth delivered results similar to those of in-person services.

    “A systematic review of telehealth for dementia care, including routine care, cognitive assessment and rehabilitation, found that telehealth delivered results similar to those of in-person services.712”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [712]

    The Abstract (Results) identifies routine care, cognitive assessment, and telerehabilitation and reports results similar to in-person visits for cognitive assessment and diagnosis. The Results (Intervention Characteristics) report improvement after telerehabilitation, but do not establish that rehabilitation outcomes—or routine care generally—were similar to in-person services. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A systematic review of telehealth for dementia care, including routine care, cognitive assessment, and rehabilitation, found that telehealth delivered results similar to those of in-person services.

    “A systematic review of telehealth for dementia care, including routine care, cognitive assessment and rehabilitation, found that telehealth delivered results similar to those of in‐person services. 856”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [856]

    The Abstract (Results; page not specified) reports similar results to in-person visits for cognitive assessment and diagnosis. The Results (Intervention Characteristics; page not specified) report improvement after telerehabilitation, but do not establish that rehabilitation outcomes were similar to in-person services. The claim extends the in-person comparison across all the care types reviewed. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yi, J. S., Pittman, C. A., Price, C. L., Nieman, C. L., & Oh, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Howard University (US)
  • Towson University (US)
Corresponding author
Nieman, Carrie L.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
1396-1402.e18
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3152666921
Cited by
143
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Howard (Howard University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
  • National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
telemedicine, dementia care, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, mild cognitive impairment, older adults, barriers and facilitators, care partners, patient satisfaction, telerehabilitation, cognitive assessment, sensory impairment, hearing loss, visual impairment, accessible technology, health care access
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Telemedicine, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review