Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polarization entangled photon-pair source based on quantum nonlinear photonics and interferometry

Kaiser, F., Ngah, L.A., Issautier, A., Delord, T., Aktas, D., D׳Auria, V., De Micheli, M.P., Kastberg, A., Labonté, L., Alibart, O., Martin, A., Tanzilli, S.·2014·Optics Communications

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.optcom.2014.03.056

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accurate control over path-encoded qubits for universal manipulation is possible with relatively low technological requirements compared to other encoding schemes.

    “Indeed, accurate control over these qubits for universal manipulation is possible with relatively low technological requirements when compared to other encoding schemes [37,122].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Conclusion describes precise control of polarization-entangled states, not path-encoded qubits. A search for path encoding found discussion of interferometer paths in the polarization-entanglement preparation stage, but no claim about universal manipulation of path-encoded qubits or their technological requirements relative to other encodings. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Scarani, 2009, Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 1301, 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301 · DOI
  2. Yoshino, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 223, 10.1364/OL.37.000223 · DOI
  3. Aboussouan, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 021801, 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.021801 · DOI
  4. McMillan, 2013, Sci. Rep., 3, 2032, 10.1038/srep02032 · DOI
  5. Lvovsky, 2009, Nat. Photonics, 3, 706, 10.1038/nphoton.2009.231 · DOI
  6. Sangouard, 2011, Rev. Mod. Phys., 83, 33, 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.33 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Aspect, 1982, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 91, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Tittel, 2001, Quantum Inf. Comput., 1, 3
  9. Tittel, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 3563, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3563 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Weihs, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 5039, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ma, 2012, Nat. Phys., 8, 480, 10.1038/nphys2294 · DOI
  12. Peruzzo, 2012, Science, 338, 634, 10.1126/science.1226719 · DOI
  13. Kaiser, 2012, Science, 338, 637, 10.1126/science.1226755 · DOI
  14. Lvovsky, 2013, Nat. Phys., 9, 541, 10.1038/nphys2682 · DOI
  15. Bruno, 2013, Nat. Phys., 9, 545, 10.1038/nphys2681 · DOI
  16. Lloyd, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 167903, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167903 · DOI
  17. Landry, 2007, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 24, 398, 10.1364/JOSAB.24.000398 · DOI
  18. Ursin, 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 481, 10.1038/nphys629 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hübel, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 7853, 10.1364/OE.15.007853 · DOI
  20. Fasel, 2004, Eur. Phys. J. D, 30, 143, 10.1140/epjd/e2004-00080-8 · DOI
  21. Tanzilli, 2012, Laser Photonics Rev., 6, 115, 10.1002/lpor.201100010 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kaiser, 2012, New J. Phys., 14, 085015, 10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/085015 · DOI
  23. Herrmann, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 27981, 10.1364/OE.21.027981 · DOI
  24. Kaiser, 2013, Laser Phys. Lett., 10, 045202, 10.1088/1612-2011/10/4/045202 · DOI
  25. Fulconis, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 120501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.120501 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Fang, 2014, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 31, 277, 10.1364/JOSAB.31.000277 · DOI
  27. Fiorentino, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 20149, 10.1364/OE.16.020149 · DOI
  28. Piro, 2009, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 42, 114002, 10.1088/0953-4075/42/11/114002 · DOI
  29. Wang, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 70, 043804, 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.043804 · DOI
  30. Kuklewicz, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 223601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.223601 · DOI
  31. Bao, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 190501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.190501 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Dousse, 2010, Nature, 466, 217, 10.1038/nature09148 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Dudin, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 260502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.260502 · DOI
  34. Yan, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 033601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.033601 · DOI
  35. Martin, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 020301(R), 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.020301 · DOI
  36. Xavier, 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 045015, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045015 · DOI
  37. Reim, 2010, Nat. Photonics, 4, 218, 10.1038/nphoton.2010.30 · DOI
  38. Clausen, 2011, Nature, 469, 508, 10.1038/nature09662 · DOI
  39. Saglamyurek, 2011, Nature, 469, 512, 10.1038/nature09719 · DOI
  40. Tanji, 2009, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, 043601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.043601 · DOI
  41. Piro, 2011, Nat. Phys., 7, 17, 10.1038/nphys1805 · DOI
  42. Franson, 1989, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 2205, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2205 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Chanvillard, 2000, Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 1089, 10.1063/1.125948 · DOI
  44. Tanzilli, 2002, Eur. J. Phys. D, 18, 155
  45. Halder, 2008, New J. Phys., 10, 10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/023027 · DOI
  46. Martin, 2012, Laser Phys., 22, 1105, 10.1134/S1054660X12060060 · DOI
  47. D.B. Leviton, B.J. Frey, Temperature-Dependent Absolute Refractive Index Measurements of Synthetic Fused Silica, 2008, arxiv:0805.0091. · arXiv
  48. Altepeter, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 033601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.033601 · DOI
  49. Bell, 1964, Physics, 1, 195, 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Clauser, 1969, Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 880, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Tittel, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 4150, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4150 · DOI
  52. Tapster, 1998, J. Mod. Opt., 45, 595, 10.1080/09500349808231917 · DOI
  53. Monteiro, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 4371, 10.1364/OE.22.004371 · DOI
  54. de Riedmatten, 2004, J. Mod. Opt., 51, 1637, 10.1080/09500340408232478 · DOI
  55. Sekatski, 2012, J. Phys. B, 45, 124016, 10.1088/0953-4075/45/12/124016 · DOI
  56. Hadfield, 2009, Nat. Photonics, 3, 696, 10.1038/nphoton.2009.230 · DOI
  57. Castaldini, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 17868, 10.1364/OE.17.017868 · DOI
  58. Tanzilli, 2005, Nature, 437, 116, 10.1038/nature04009 · DOI
  59. Curtz, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, 22099, 10.1364/OE.18.022099 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kaiser, F., Ngah, L. A., Issautier, A., Delord, T., Aktas, D., D׳Auria, V., De Micheli, M. P., Kastberg, A., Labonté, L., Alibart, O., Martin, A., & Tanzilli, S.
Venue
Optics Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
327
Pages
7-16
ISSN
0030-4018
Cited by
34
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review