The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Polarization entangled photon-pair source based on quantum nonlinear photonics and interferometry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accurate control over path-encoded qubits for universal manipulation is possible with relatively low technological requirements compared to other encoding schemes.
“Indeed, accurate control over these qubits for universal manipulation is possible with relatively low technological requirements when compared to other encoding schemes [37,122].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
The Conclusion describes precise control of polarization-entangled states, not path-encoded qubits. A search for path encoding found discussion of interferometer paths in the polarization-entanglement preparation stage, but no claim about universal manipulation of path-encoded qubits or their technological requirements relative to other encodings. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- Scarani, 2009, Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 1301, 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301 · DOI
- Yoshino, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 223, 10.1364/OL.37.000223 · DOI
- Aboussouan, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 021801, 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.021801 · DOI
- McMillan, 2013, Sci. Rep., 3, 2032, 10.1038/srep02032 · DOI
- Lvovsky, 2009, Nat. Photonics, 3, 706, 10.1038/nphoton.2009.231 · DOI
- Sangouard, 2011, Rev. Mod. Phys., 83, 33, 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.33 · DOI · Paper page
- Aspect, 1982, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 91, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91 · DOI · Paper page
- Tittel, 2001, Quantum Inf. Comput., 1, 3
- Tittel, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 3563, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3563 · DOI · Paper page
- Weihs, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 5039, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039 · DOI · Paper page
- Ma, 2012, Nat. Phys., 8, 480, 10.1038/nphys2294 · DOI
- Peruzzo, 2012, Science, 338, 634, 10.1126/science.1226719 · DOI
- Kaiser, 2012, Science, 338, 637, 10.1126/science.1226755 · DOI
- Lvovsky, 2013, Nat. Phys., 9, 541, 10.1038/nphys2682 · DOI
- Bruno, 2013, Nat. Phys., 9, 545, 10.1038/nphys2681 · DOI
- Lloyd, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 167903, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167903 · DOI
- Landry, 2007, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 24, 398, 10.1364/JOSAB.24.000398 · DOI
- Ursin, 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 481, 10.1038/nphys629 · DOI · Paper page
- Hübel, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 7853, 10.1364/OE.15.007853 · DOI
- Fasel, 2004, Eur. Phys. J. D, 30, 143, 10.1140/epjd/e2004-00080-8 · DOI
- Tanzilli, 2012, Laser Photonics Rev., 6, 115, 10.1002/lpor.201100010 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaiser, 2012, New J. Phys., 14, 085015, 10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/085015 · DOI
- Herrmann, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 27981, 10.1364/OE.21.027981 · DOI
- Kaiser, 2013, Laser Phys. Lett., 10, 045202, 10.1088/1612-2011/10/4/045202 · DOI
- Fulconis, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 120501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.120501 · DOI · Paper page
- Fang, 2014, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 31, 277, 10.1364/JOSAB.31.000277 · DOI
- Fiorentino, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 20149, 10.1364/OE.16.020149 · DOI
- Piro, 2009, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 42, 114002, 10.1088/0953-4075/42/11/114002 · DOI
- Wang, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 70, 043804, 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.043804 · DOI
- Kuklewicz, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 223601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.223601 · DOI
- Bao, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 190501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.190501 · DOI · Paper page
- Dousse, 2010, Nature, 466, 217, 10.1038/nature09148 · DOI · Paper page
- Dudin, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 260502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.260502 · DOI
- Yan, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 033601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.033601 · DOI
- Martin, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 020301(R), 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.020301 · DOI
- Xavier, 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 045015, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045015 · DOI
- Reim, 2010, Nat. Photonics, 4, 218, 10.1038/nphoton.2010.30 · DOI
- Clausen, 2011, Nature, 469, 508, 10.1038/nature09662 · DOI
- Saglamyurek, 2011, Nature, 469, 512, 10.1038/nature09719 · DOI
- Tanji, 2009, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, 043601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.043601 · DOI
- Piro, 2011, Nat. Phys., 7, 17, 10.1038/nphys1805 · DOI
- Franson, 1989, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 2205, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2205 · DOI · Paper page
- Chanvillard, 2000, Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 1089, 10.1063/1.125948 · DOI
- Tanzilli, 2002, Eur. J. Phys. D, 18, 155
- Halder, 2008, New J. Phys., 10, 10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/023027 · DOI
- Martin, 2012, Laser Phys., 22, 1105, 10.1134/S1054660X12060060 · DOI
- D.B. Leviton, B.J. Frey, Temperature-Dependent Absolute Refractive Index Measurements of Synthetic Fused Silica, 2008, arxiv:0805.0091. · arXiv
- Altepeter, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 033601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.033601 · DOI
- Bell, 1964, Physics, 1, 195, 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195 · DOI · Paper page
- Clauser, 1969, Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 880, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880 · DOI · Paper page
- Tittel, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 4150, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4150 · DOI
- Tapster, 1998, J. Mod. Opt., 45, 595, 10.1080/09500349808231917 · DOI
- Monteiro, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 4371, 10.1364/OE.22.004371 · DOI
- de Riedmatten, 2004, J. Mod. Opt., 51, 1637, 10.1080/09500340408232478 · DOI
- Sekatski, 2012, J. Phys. B, 45, 124016, 10.1088/0953-4075/45/12/124016 · DOI
- Hadfield, 2009, Nat. Photonics, 3, 696, 10.1038/nphoton.2009.230 · DOI
- Castaldini, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 17868, 10.1364/OE.17.017868 · DOI
- Tanzilli, 2005, Nature, 437, 116, 10.1038/nature04009 · DOI
- Curtz, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, 22099, 10.1364/OE.18.022099 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Recent advances on integrated quantum communications
Orieux, A., & Diamanti, E. (2016) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8978/18/8/083002 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, F., Ngah, L. A., Issautier, A., Delord, T., Aktas, D., D׳Auria, V., De Micheli, M. P., Kastberg, A., Labonté, L., Alibart, O., Martin, A., & Tanzilli, S.
- Venue
- Optics Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 327
- Pages
- 7-16
- ISSN
- 0030-4018
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review