The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applying the Job Demands-Resources model
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Paramedic work inherently involves job-related resources, that is, aspects that are functional for work achievement, motivating and stimulating personal development or reducing job demands [34] and, hence, leading to higher job engagement.”
From Paramedics’ perceptions of job demands and resources in Finnish emergency medical services: a qualitative study (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This model constitutes the best theory of job burnout so far, because it not only explains and predicts the occurrence of job burnout (Hakanen et al., 2008) but also provides clear directions for reducing burnout in organizations (see e.g., Schaufeli, 2017).”
From A Theoretical and Clinical Framework for Parental Burnout: The Balance Between Risks and Resources (BR2) (2018) · cites this paper as Schaufeli, 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Developed by Demerouti and Bakker, the JD-R model is a validated theoretical model showing a pathway between job demands and resources to work-related stress, burnout and compassion fatigue [32] and, inversely, positive and fulfilling engagement in work [34, 35].”
From Paramedics’ perceptions of job demands and resources in Finnish emergency medical services: a qualitative study (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217 · Cited by 2,276
Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research.
Fisher, G. G., Matthews, R. A., & Gibbons, A. M. (2015) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0039139 · Cited by 794
Burnout, engagement, coping and general health of service employees in the hospitality industry
Pienaar, J. W., & Willemse, S. A. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.006 · Cited by 225
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]1. The Job Demands-Resources Model The JD-R model, which originally only included burnout, was first published in: Demerouti E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2001). The Job Demands--Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512.
- [2]2. A few year later, the extended JD-R model with engagement was published: Schaufeli, W.B. & Bakker, A.B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Jour- nal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315. Both seminal papers haven been cited over 3500 times each (Google Scholar; May, 2016), which illustrates the popularity of the JD-R model among researchers. Still a few year later, personal resources were added to the model: Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235-244. A conceptual overview can be found in: Bakker, A. & Demerouti, E. (2007), The Job Demands- Resources (JD-R) model: State of the art. Journal of Manage- rial Psychology, 22, 309-328. An overview of recent empiri- cal findings is presented in: Schaufeli, W.B. & Taris, T.W. (2014). A critical review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for improving work and health. In G. Bauer & O. Hämmig (Eds), Bridging occupational, organiza- tional and public health (pp. 43-68). Dordrecht: Springer. The most recent review is: Taris, T.W. & Schaufeli, W.B. (in press). The Job Demands-Resources model, its bases, appli- cations and range. In S. Clarke, T. Probst, F. Guldenmund and J. Passmore (Eds), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of occupational safety and workplace health. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Assessment (Energy Compass) Various questionnaires have been published to assess psy- chosocial work factors and employee well being, for instance: (1) the Questionnaire on the Experience and Eva- luation of Work (QEEW), Van Veldhoven, M., De Jonge, J., Broersen, S., Kompier, M., & Meijman, T. (2002). Specific relations between psychosocial job conditions and job- related stress: A three-level analytic approach. Work & Stress, 16, 207-228; (the Copenhagen Psychosocial Ques- tionnaire (COPSOC), Kristensen, T., Hannertz, H., Hogh, A., & Borg, V. (2005). The Copenhagen Psychosocial Question- naire (COPSOQ)--A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 31, 438-449; (3) the Nordic Questionnaire for Psychosocial and Social Factors at Work (QPS Nordic ), Elo, A. L., Skogstad, A., Dallner, M., Gamberale, F., Hottinen, V., & Knardahl, S. (2000). User's guide for the QPSNordic: General Nordic Questionnaire for psychological and social factors at work. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; (4) the Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards Indicator Tool (HSE MSIT), Edwards, J.A. & Web- ster, S. (2012). Psychosocial risk assessment: measurement invariance of the UK Health and Safety Executive's Manage- ment Standards Indicator. Work & Stress, 26, 130-142.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies
Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2018) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065 · Cited by 1,116
“Demerouti, Le Blanc, Bakker, Schaufeli, and Hox (2009) *** *** *** **** ****”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWork Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model
Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941211051988 · Cited by 912
“The overall purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the relationship between work engagement, its outcomes, and different resource categories, using the taxonomy proposed by the Energy Compass tool (Schaufeli, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMikolajczak, M., & Roskam, I. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00886 · Cited by 599
“This model constitutes the best theory of job burnout so far, because it not only explains and predicts the occurrence of job burnout (Hakanen et al., 2008) but also provides clear directions for reducing burnout in organizations (see e.g., Schaufeli, 2017).”
BackgroundJob demands–job resources (JD-R) model, work engagement, and well-being of cruise ship employees
Radić, A., Fuentes, J. M. A., Ariza‐Montes, A., Han, H., & Law, R. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102518 · Cited by 307
Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Mirza, M. Z., Cheah, J., Ting, H., Ahmad, M. S., & Tariq, A. (2020) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-04-2018-0127 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaufeli, W. B.
- Corresponding author
- Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
- ORCID
- Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
- Venue
- Organizational Dynamics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 120-132
- ISSN
- 0090-2616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2619380358
- Cited by
- 1,026
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 201 · 2025: 188 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 57.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Organizational Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Research Fund KU Leuven
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Keywords
- job demands-resources model, job demands, job resources, employee well-being, occupational stress, work engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
