Macrophages accumulate in the early phase of tendon–bone healing
Open accessAbstract
A scar tissue interface forms rather than a normal ligament insertion site following attachment of a tendon graft to bone. The specific cell types that initiate the process of tendon-to-bone healing are unknown. We hypothesized that inflammatory cell accumulation following tendon-to-bone repair results in this scar interface. We used a rodent model to examine the temporal and spatial pattern of accumulation of hematopoietic lineage cells in the early phase of tendon-to-bone healing. Thirty-six Lewis rats underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the left knee using a flexor digitorum longus tendon graft. Six animals were sacrificed at 4, 7, 11, 14, 21, and 28 days after surgery. Serial sections were analyzed for proliferating cells (PCNA), recruited macrophages (ED1), resident macrophages (ED2), neutrophils, T-lymphocytes (CD3), mast cells, immature progenitor cells/pericytes (expressing the NG2 cell-surface chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan), and newly-formed blood vessels (Factor VIII). Neutrophils, ED1(+) and ED2(+) macrophages accumulated sequentially in the healing tendon graft, with progressive cell ingrowth from the interface towards the inner tendon. Neutrophils and ED1(+) cells were seen in the tendon-bone interface at 4 days after surgery, while ED2(+) macrophages were not identified until 11 days. These cells progressively repopulated the tendon graft. NG2-positive progenitor cells were found along the edge of the bone tunnel in the interface, but these cells did not invade the tendon. Occasional T-lymphocytes and mast cells were seen in the tendon-bone interface. There was no proliferation of intrinsic tendon cells, indicating that the tendon does not directly contribute to healing. We hypothesize that cytokines produced by infiltrating macrophages are likely to contribute to the formation of a fibrous scar tissue interface rather than a normal insertion site.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The graft-bone healing process may be promoted by host stem cells from the circumambient bone marrow in the bone tunnel.
“The graft–bone healing process may be promoted by the host stem cells from the circumambient bone marrow in the bone tunnel [37–39]”
Cites
Secretory products of macrophages.
Nathan, C. F. (1987) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci112815 · Cited by 2,615 · see citing works
Ignotz, R. A., & Massagué, J. (1986) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)35666-1 · Cited by 2,492 · see citing works
St Pierre, B. A., & Tidball, J. G. (1994) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1994.77.1.290 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thanasas, C., Papadimitriou, G., Charalambidis, C., Paraskevopoulos, I., & Papanikolaou, A. (2011) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546511417113 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Bi, F., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Hu, W., & Tian, K. (2021) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2021/6697969 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Effect of anterior cruciate healing on the uninjured ligament insertion site
Haus, B. M., Mastrangelo, A. N., & Murray, M. M. (2012) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.21498 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kawamura, S., Ying, L., Kim, H.-J., Dynybil, C., & Rodeo, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rodeo, Scott A.
- ORCID
- Rodeo, Scott A.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1425-1432
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2010568015
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (1P30AR46121-01, P30AR046121)
- National Center for Research Resources (C06 RR12538-01, C06RR012538)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
- Keywords
- tendon-bone healing, macrophages, scar formation, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, ED1 macrophages, neutrophils, pericytes, T cells, mast cells
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Female, Knee Injuries, Macrophages, Male, Membrane Proteins, Neutrophils, Rats, Inbred Lew, Tendons, Wound Healing, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Tumor Necrosis Factors, Rats, Ectodysplasins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review