Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cellular basis for age-related changes in fracture repair

Open access
LU, C, MICLAU, T, HU, D, HANSEN, E, TSUI, K, PUTTLITZ, C, MARCUCIO, R·2005·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

The goal of this work was to define cellular and molecular changes that occur during fracture healing as animals age. We compared the molecular, cellular, and histological progression of skeletal repair in juvenile (4 weeks old), middle-aged (6 months old), and elderly (18 months old) mice at 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days post-fracture, using a non-stabilized tibia fracture model. Our histological and molecular analyses demonstrated that there was a sharp decline in fracture healing potential between juvenile and middle-aged animals, while a more subtle decrease in healing potential was apparent between middle-aged and elderly mice. By three days after fracture, chondrocytes expressing Collagen type II, and osteoblasts expressing osteocalcin, were present in calluses of juvenile, but not middle-aged or elderly, mice. At day 5 immature chondrocytes and osteoblasts were observed in calluses of middle-aged and elderly mice. While at this time, chondrocytes in juvenile mice were expressing Collagen type X (ColX) indicating that chondrocyte maturation was already underway. At day 7, chondrocytes expressing ColX were abundant in middle-aged mice while a small domain of ColX-positive chondrocytes were observed in elderly mice. Further, in juvenile and middle-aged mice, but not elderly mice, vascular invasion of the cartilage was underway by day 7. Juvenile mice had replaced nearly all of the cartilage by day 14, while cartilage was still present in the callus of middle-aged mice at day 21 and in elderly mice at day 28. In addition to these delays, histomorphometry revealed that elderly and middle-aged mice formed less bone than juveniles (p<0.001), while cartilage production was unaffected (p>0.22). Collectively, these data suggest that enhancing cell differentiation, improving osteoblast function, and accelerating endochondral ossification may significantly benefit the elderly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
LU, C., MICLAU, T., HU, D., HANSEN, E., TSUI, K., PUTTLITZ, C., & MARCUCIO, R.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1300-1307
ISSN
0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087125520
Cited by
232
References
0
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular basis for age-related changes in fracture repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.orthres.2005.04.003
The paper
LU, C., MICLAU, T., HU, D., HANSEN, E., TSUI, K., PUTTLITZ, C., & MARCUCIO, R. (2005). Cellular basis for age-related changes in fracture repair. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2005.04.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.