A systematic review of the use of intranasal steroids in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis
Abstract
Objective To determine if intranasal steroids (INS) are useful in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with polyps. Data sources Studies for inclusion were searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and references of included studies. Review methods Initial screening of article titles and abstracts obtained from the literature search was performed independently by two reviewers (SAJ and RT) based on the research protocol criteria. These articles then underwent a second-stage review. Each article was read in detail and discussed by the two reviewers before inclusion in the study. Results The review yielded 13 studies regarding the treatment of sinonasal polyps with intranasal steroids. Six of these could be included in the meta-analysis. The outcome measure used for meta-analysis was change in polyp size from baseline compared between the treatment and control groups. Results from both conservative and optimistic selection of treatment effect are positive, providing significant improvement in polyp size in the treatment group as compared to controls. In the conservative estimate, the mean improvement in polyp size score between the treatment and placebo group is 0.43 with a 95% CI of [0.25, 0.61]. Of those treatment groups with the largest improvement, the mean improvement in polyp size score can go as high as 0.63 with a 95% CI of [0.43, 0.82]. Conclusion Intranasal steroids are beneficial in the treatment of chroni…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intranasal corticosteroids improve NO, edema, polyp size, and recurrence after surgery.
“They improve NO, as well as edema, polyp size [136,137], and recurrence after surgery [138].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [136]
Cites
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It has been said that reports with significant results are more likely to be published and receive more attention, resulting in potential publication bias.(17,18) However, we feel that restricting our study to the use of randomized, blinded, controlled studies minimizes this bias.”
BackgroundResult
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical Practice Guideline (Update): Adult Sinusitis
Rosenfeld, R. M., Piccirillo, J. F., Chandrasekhar, S. S., Brook, I., Ashok Kumar, K., Kramper, M., Orlandi, R. R., Palmer, J. N., Patel, Z. M., Peters, A., et al. (2015) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599815572097 · Cited by 1,159 · see citing works
Mepolizumab, a humanized anti–IL-5 mAb, as a treatment option for severe nasal polyposis
Gevaert, P., Van Bruaene, N., Cattaert, T., Van Steen, K., Van Zele, T., Acke, F., De Ruyck, N., Blomme, K., Sousa, A. R., Marshall, R. P., et al. (2011) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.07.056 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis
Desrosiers, M., Evans, G. A., Keith, P. K., Wright, E. D., Kaplan, A., Bouchard, J., Ciavarella, A., Doyle, P. W., Javer, A. R., Leith, E. S., et al. (2011) · Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-7-2 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Inhalational steroids and iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome
A.V, R. (2014) · The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal · doi:10.2174/1874306401408010074 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Joe, S. A., Thambi, R., & Huang, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Joe, Stephanie A.
- Venue
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 340-347
- ISSN
- 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
- 0194-5998
- 1097-6817
- OpenAlex
- W2067311037
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Keywords
- intranasal corticosteroids, chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, sinonasal polyps, polyp size reduction
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Chronic Disease, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Rhinitis, Sinusitis, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review