Cited by 19Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityHealth Sciences Research and EducationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Factors affecting nurses' attitudes in Israel toward patients who present them with Internet medical information

Barnoy, Sivia, Volfin-Pruss, Diana, Ehrenfeld, Malka, Kushnir, Talma·2008·Nursing Outlook

Abstract

Nurses regularly encounter patients bringing with them medical data from the Internet. The purpose of the present study was to examine the prevalence of these encounters, nurses' attitudes to these patients, and the factors that might influence their attitudes. A cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of 110 nurses (32 practical nurses, 35 registered nurses and 43 academically trained nurses). The main variables measured were: attitudes toward patients presenting Internet information, professional self-esteem, and three indices of Internet use. The results show that most nurses had encountered patients presenting Internet medical information and held positive attitudes to them. Nurses with such experience had more positive attitudes than nurses with no such experience. Professional self-esteem and indices of Internet use were also positively correlated to favorable attitudes to these patients. Regression analysis showed that professional self-esteem and Internet self-efficacy predicted attitudes to these patients. Since the number of patients presenting Internet information can only multiply, there is a need to prepare and train nurses for encounters with such patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.05.008

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnoy, S., Volfin-Pruss, D., Ehrenfeld, M., & Kushnir, T.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Barnoy, Sivia
Venue
Nursing Outlook
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
314-321
ISSN
0029-6554 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986599715
Cited by
19
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Outlook (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
nurses' attitudes, online health information, professional self-esteem, internet self-efficacy, nurse-patient encounters, nurse training
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Computer Literacy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Israel, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Education as Topic, Professional Competence, Nursing Methodology Research, Linear Models, Self Efficacy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review