CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 242Emotional Intelligence and PerformancePersonality Traits and PsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Emotional intelligence: Not much more than g and personality

Schulte, Melanie J, Ree, Malcolm James, Carretta, Thomas R·2004·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MSCEIT was almost entirely predicted by IQ, the big five, and gender, with a multiple correlation of .81.

    “the Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) was almost entirely predicted by IQ, the big five, and gender (the multiple correlation was .81!, Schulte, Ree & Carretta, 2004)”

    From Does leadership need emotional intelligence? (2009) · cites this paper as Schulte, Ree & Carretta, 2004

  • The Schulte, Ree, and Carretta (2004) study involved a small sample of students and failed to look at the different branches of emotional intelligence.

    “But this study involved a small sample of students and failed to look at the different branches of emotional intelligence identified by Mayer and Salovey (1997).”

    From Does leadership need emotional intelligence? (2009) · cites this paper as Schulte, Ree, and Carretta (2004)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulte, M. J., Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Our Lady of the Lake University (US)
  • United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Ree, Malcolm James
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1059-1068
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.014
OpenAlex
W1987502789
Cited by
242
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
emotional intelligence, general intelligence, Big Five personality traits, construct validity, human performance, Wonderlic Personnel Test, agreeableness, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review