Cited by 289Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceTeam Dynamics and PerformanceLeadership and Management in Organizations

Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership

Kellett, Janet B, Humphrey, Ronald H, Sleeth, Randall G·2002·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00142-x

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Kellett, Janet B
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
523-544
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996724034
Cited by
287
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
Keywords
empathy, complex task performance, leadership perceptions, emotional abilities, cognitive ability, small group leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review