Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 965

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample

Frick, Jacqueline, Kaiser, Florian G., Wilson, Mark·2004·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 965

Metadata

Authors
Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
1597-1613
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
OpenAlex
W2041220996
Cited by
965
References
49
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
The paper
Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.