The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing! testing! one, two, three – Testing the theory in structural equation models!
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit
Barrett, P. (2007) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018 · Cited by 2,611
Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994) · Cited by 2,388
Latent Variables Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research.
AA, Eye, A. V., & Clogg, C. C. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291370 · Cited by 1,376
Introduction to Structural Equation Models.
Cherlin, A., & Duncan, O. D. (1976) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064059 · Cited by 1,190
Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects.
Bollen, K. A. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.256 · Cited by 915
Introduction to Structural Equation Models
(1975) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03148-1 · Cited by 446
LISREL Issues, Debates and Strategies
Williams, R., & Hayduk, L. A. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2654075 · Cited by 321
Self-citationWhen fit indices and residuals are incompatible.
Browne, M. W., MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C., Andersen, B. L., & Glaser, R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037//1082-989x.7.4.403 · Cited by 268
Structural equation model testing and the quality of natural killer cell activity measurements
Hayduk, L. A., Pazderka-Robinson, H., Cummings, G. G., Levers, M.-J. D., & Beres, M. A. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-1 · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Cited by
Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008) · Dublin Institute of Technology · doi:10.21427/d7cf7r · Cited by 8,746
On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 · Cited by 2,441
Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124108314720 · Cited by 1,538
Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12184 · Cited by 592
Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications
Kievit, R. A., Brandmaier, A. M., Ziegler, G., van Harmelen, A.-L., de Mooij, S. M. M., Moutoussis, M., Goodyer, I. M., Bullmore, E., Jones, P. B., Fonagy, P., et al. (2018) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.007 · Cited by 516
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 841-850
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050884075
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing! testing! one, two, three – Testing the theory in structural equation models! https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.001
- The paper
- Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! testing! one, two, three – Testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
