The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural equation model testing and the quality of natural killer cell activity measurements
Open accessAbstract
Background: Browne et al. [Browne, MacCallum, Kim, Andersen, Glaser: When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychol Methods 2002] employed a structural equation model of measurements of target cell lysing by natural killer cells as an example purportedly demonstrating that small but statistically significant ill model fit can be dismissed as "negligible from a practical point of view". Methods: Reanalysis of the natural killer cell data reveals that the supposedly negligible ill fit obscured important, systematic, and substantial causal misspecifications. Results: A clean-fitting structural equation model indicates that measurements employing higher natural-killer-cell to target-cell ratios are more strongly influenced by a progressively intrusive factor, whether or not the natural killer cell activity is activated by recombinant interferon γ (rIFN γ). The progressive influence may reflect independent rate limiting steps in cell recognition and attachment, spatial competition for cell attachment points, or the simultaneous lysings of single target cells by multiple natural killer cells. Conclusions: If the progressively influential factor is ultimately identified as a mere procedural impediment, the substantive conclusion will be that measurements of natural killer cell activity made at lower effector to target ratios are more valid. Alternatively, if the individual variations in the progressively influential factor are modifiable, this may presage a new therapeutic route to enhancing natural killer cell activity. The methodological conclusion is that, when using structural equation models, researchers should attend to significant model ill fit even if the degree of covariance ill fit is small, because small covariance residuals do not imply that the underlying model misspecifications are correspondingly small or inconsequential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
Stress and Immune Responses After Surgical Treatment for Regional Breast Cancer
Andersen, B. L., Farrar, W. B., Golden-Kreutz, D., Kutz, L. A., MacCallum, R., Courtney, M. E., & Glaser, R. (1998) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.1.30 · Cited by 398
A biobehavioral model of cancer stress and disease course.
Andersen, B. L., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.5.389 · Cited by 357
When fit indices and residuals are incompatible.
Browne, M. W., MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C., Andersen, B. L., & Glaser, R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037//1082-989x.7.4.403 · Cited by 268
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hayduk LA: Structural Equation Modelling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances. 1987, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press
Cited by
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
Edwards, P. J., Roberts, I., Clarke, M. J., DiGuiseppi, C., Wentz, R., Kwan, I., Cooper, R., Felix, L. M., & Pratap, S. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000008.pub4 · Cited by 1,379
Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
Yargawa, J., & Leonardi-Bee, J. (2015) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2014-204784 · Cited by 499
Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Draxler, C., Ziegler, M., & Bühner, M. (2011) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0024917 · Cited by 406
Testing! testing! one, two, three – Testing the theory in structural equation models!
Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.001 · Cited by 366
Self-citationGowda, U., Mutowo, M. P., Smith, B. J., Wluka, A. E., & Renzaho, A. M. N. (2015) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2014.06.017 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayduk, L. A., Pazderka-Robinson, H., Cummings, G. G., Levers, M.-J. D., & Beres, M. A.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2005-01-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1791587479
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural equation model testing and the quality of natural killer cell activity measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2288-5-1
- The paper
- Hayduk, L. A., Pazderka-Robinson, H., Cummings, G. G., Levers, M.-J. D., & Beres, M. A. (2005). Structural equation model testing and the quality of natural killer cell activity measurements. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.