When fit indices and residuals are incompatible.

Abstract

Standard chi-square-based fit indices for factor analysis and related models have a little known property: They are more sensitive to misfit when unique variances are small than when they are large. Consequently, very small correlation residuals indicating excellent fit can be accompanied by indications of bad fit by the fit indices when unique variances are small. An empirical example of this incompatibility between residuals and fit indices is provided. For illustrative purposes, an artificial example is provided that yields exactly the same correlation residuals as the empirical example but has larger unique variances. For this example, the fit indices indicate excellent fit. A theoretical explanation for this phenomenon is provided using relationships between unique variances and eigenvalues of the fitted correlation matrix.

Cites (1)

1. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification
   Hu, Li-tze, Bentler, Peter M. · 1998 · Psychological Methods

Show all 1 references

Cited by (10)

1. Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics
   Iacobucci, Dawn · 2010 · Journal of Consumer Psychology
2. What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?
   Wilhelm, Oliver, Hildebrandt, Andrea, Oberauer, Klaus · 2013 · Frontiers in Psychology
3. What No Child Left Behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades.
   Duckworth, Angela L., Quinn, Patrick D., Tsukayama, Eli · 2012 · Journal of Educational Psychology
4. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.
   Heene, Moritz, Hilbert, Sven, Draxler, Clemens, Ziegler, Matthias, Bühner, Markus · 2011 · Psychological Methods
5. Development of a short form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) using nonparametric item response theory: The SIAS-6 and the SPS-6.
   Peters, Lorna, Sunderland, Matthew, Andrews, Gavin, Rapee, Ronald M., Mattick, Richard P. · 2012 · Psychological Assessment

See all 268