Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individual differences in belief in a dangerous world predict endorsement of the binding moral foundations.
“Finally, there is some direct evidence that individual differences in belief in a dangerous world predict endorsement of the binding moral foundations [54].”
From The amoral atheist? A cross-national examination of cultural, motivational, and cognitive antecedents of disbelief, and their implications for morality (2021) · cites this paper as [54]
Existential threats are linked to increased group cohesion.
“based on a substantial literature linking various existential threats to increased group cohesion [34, 51–54]”
From The amoral atheist? A cross-national examination of cultural, motivational, and cognitive antecedents of disbelief, and their implications for morality (2021) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383 · see citing works
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335 · see citing works
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The main difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals focus on progress towards equalitarianism whereas conservatives show resistance to change and tolerate inequality (Jost, 2006; Jost et al., 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialLandau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., Miller, C. H., Ogilvie, D. M., & Cook, A. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204267988 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Religiosity, political orientation, and consequentialist moral thinking
Piazza, J., & Sousa, P. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550613492826 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
The five-factor model of the moral foundations theory is stable across WEIRD and non-WEIRD cultures
Doğruyol, B., Alper, S., & Yilmaz, O. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109547 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Ståhl, T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246593 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Finally, there is some direct evidence that individual differences in belief in a dangerous world predict endorsement of the binding moral foundations [54].”
BackgroundWheeler, M. A., & Laham, S. M. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216653374 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Justin H.
- ORCID
- Park, Justin H.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-173
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048930909
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- political orientation, conservatism, liberalism, moral foundations, binding moral foundations, individualizing moral foundations, fear and anxiety, individual differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
