The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterizing Carver and White's BIS/BAS subscales using the Five Factor Model of personality
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher agreeableness is associated with higher BIS and lower BAS.
“There is also evidence that higher agreeableness is associated with higher BIS and lower BAS (Keiser & Ross, 2011; Mitchell et al., 2007; Segarra et al., 2014; Slobodskaya, 2007; Smits & Boeck, 2006).”
From Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Personality: Links to BIS/BAS Sensitivity and the Five Factor Model (2018) · cites this paper as Segarra et al., 2014
Conscientiousness is positively associated with BIS and/or negatively associated with BAS.
“Studies have found that conscientiousness is positively associated with BIS (Keiser & Ross, 2011; Mitchell et al., 2007; Segarra et al., 2014) and/or negatively associated with BAS (Mitchell et al., 2007; Slobodskaya, 2007; Smits & Boeck, 2006).”
From Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Personality: Links to BIS/BAS Sensitivity and the Five Factor Model (2018) · cites this paper as Segarra et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: An epidemiological study
Johnson, S. L., Turner, R. J., & Iwata, N. (2003) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1023/a:1022247919288 · Cited by 458
Smits, D. J. M., & Boeck, P. D. (2006) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.583 · Cited by 284
Heym, N., Ferguson, E., & Lawrence, C. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.013 · Cited by 255
Psychometric properties of Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS Scales in a large sample of offenders
Poythress, N. G., Skeem, J. L., Weir, J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Douglas, K. S., Edens, J. F., & Kennealy, P. J. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.021 · Cited by 106
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Beck, 2009, Psychometric evaluation of the Behavioral Inhibition/Behavioral Activation System scales and the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients, Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 407, 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.007 · DOI
- Carver, 1994, Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319, 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 · DOI · Paper page
- Caseras, 2003, The measurement of individual differences in behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation systems: A comparison of personality scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 999, 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00084-3 · DOI
- Corr, 2004, Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality, Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 28, 317, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Corr, 2008
- Corr, 2008, Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality, 155
- Dissabandara, 2012, Testing the fear and anxiety distinction in the BIS/BAS scales in community and heroin-dependent samples, Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 888, 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.023 · DOI
- Franken, 2006, Gray’s impulsivity dimension: A distinction between reward sensitivity and rash impulsiveness, Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1337, 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.016 · DOI
- Gray, 1970, The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249, 10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Heym, 2010, The role of Gray’s revised RST in the P-psychopathy continuum: The relationships of Psychoticism with a lack of fear and anxiety, and increased impulsivity, Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 864, 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.021 · DOI
- Keiser, 2011, Carver and Whites’ BIS/FFS/BAS scales and domains and facets of the Five Factor Model of personality, Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 39, 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
- McNaughton, 2004, A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Poythress, 2011, Psychopathy and impulsivity reconsidered, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 120, 10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.003 · DOI
- Smillie, 2006, Functional impulsivity and reinforcement sensitivity theory, Journal of Personality, 74, 48, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00369.x · DOI
- Smillie, 2006, Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective, Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1039, 10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.012 · DOI
- Smillie, 2006, The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 320, 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3 · DOI
- Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Spanish version: Seisdedos, N. (1982). Madrid: TEA ediciones.
- Torrrubia, 2001, The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions, Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837, 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00183-5 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Katz, B. A., Matanky, K., Aviram, G., & Yovel, I. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101842 · Cited by 109
Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Personality: Links to BIS/BAS Sensitivity and the Five Factor Model
Becker, S. P., Schmitt, A. P., Jarrett, M. A., Luebbe, A. M., Garner, A. A., Epstein, J. N., & Burns, G. L. (2018) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.06.001 · Cited by 20
“Studies have found that conscientiousness is positively associated with BIS (Keiser & Ross, 2011; Mitchell et al., 2007; Segarra et al., 2014) and/or negatively associated with BAS (Mitchell et al.”
BackgroundMotivational drive and alprazolam misuse: A recipe for aggression?
Albrecht, B., Staiger, P. K., Hall, K., Kambouropoulos, N., & Best, D. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.040 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Segarra, P., Poy, R., López, R., & Moltó, J.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Jaume I (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Segarra, Pilar
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 61-62
- Pages
- 18-23
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994416960
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- BIS/BAS scales, Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, Big Five personality traits, NEO-PI-R, personality facets, anxiety, fear, sensation seeking, impulsivity, reward responsiveness, drive, neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review