Cited by 1,308Memory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance

McNaughton, Neil, Corr, Philip J·2004·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

We present in this paper a picture of the neural systems controlling defense that updates and simplifies Gray's "Neuropsychology of Anxiety". It is based on two behavioural dimensions: 'defensive distance' as defined by the Blanchards and 'defensive direction'. Defensive direction is a categorical dimension with avoidance of threat corresponding to fear and approach to threat corresponding to anxiety. These two psychological dimensions are mapped to underlying neural dimensions. Defensive distance is mapped to neural level, with the shortest defensive distances involving the lowest neural level (periaqueductal grey) and the largest defensive distances the highest neural level (prefrontal cortex). Defensive direction is mapped to separate parallel streams that run across these levels. A significant departure from prior models is the proposal that both fear and anxiety are represented at all levels. The theory is presented in a simplified form that does not incorporate the interactions that must occur between non-adjacent levels of the system. It also requires expansion to include the dimension of escapability of threat. Our current development and these proposed future extensions do not change the core concepts originally proposed by Gray and, we argue, demonstrate their enduring value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005

Cites

178 of 178 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The patterns of responses evoked by socially transmitted emotions are consistent with the Blanchards' classification, according to which natural responses to threat differ depending on distance between subject and threat and probability of danger.

    “The patterns of responses evoked by socially transmitted emotions are consistent with classification suggested by the Blanchards, according to which natural responses to threat differ depending on the distance between the subject and the threat and the probability of danger.”
  • In situations involving potential danger as opposed to present danger, animals perform risk assessment behaviors, including approach and scanning; when danger is present, defensive responses such as freezing, flight or defensive attack appear.

    “In situations involving potential danger as opposed to present danger, animals perform”
  • Saccadic eye movements appear to escape the general response slowing or freezing caused by threatening stimuli.

    “saccadic EMs appear to escape the general response slowing or “freezing” (McNaughton, & Corr, 2004) caused by threatening stimuli”

    From Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis (2012) · cites this paper as McNaughton, & Corr, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
McNaughton, Neil
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
285-305
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122660499
Cited by
1,308
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 71
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
defense mechanisms, fear, anxiety, threat avoidance, periaqueductal gray, prefrontal cortex
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Brain, Brain Mapping, Escape Reaction, Fear, Hippocampus, Humans, Hypothalamus, Inhibition, Psychological, Neuropsychology, Periaqueductal Gray, Psychological Theory, Punishment, Septum of Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review