Cited by 109Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Reinforcement sensitivity, depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation model

Katz, Benjamin A., Matanky, Kathryn, Aviram, Gidi, Yovel, Iftah·2020·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) posits that individual differences in reward and punishment processing predict differences in cognition, behavior, and psychopathology. We performed a quantitative review of the relationships between reinforcement sensitivity, depression and anxiety, in two separate sets of analyses. First, we reviewed 204 studies that reported either correlations between reinforcement sensitivity and self-reported symptom severity or differences in reinforcement sensitivity between diagnosed and healthy participants, yielding 483 effect sizes. Both depression (Hedges' g = .99) and anxiety (g = 1.21) were found to be high on punishment sensitivity. Reward sensitivity negatively predicted only depressive disorders (g = -.21). More severe clinical states (e.g., acute vs remission) predicted larger effect sizes for depression but not anxiety. Next, we reviewed an additional 39 studies that reported correlations between reinforcement sensitivity and both depression and anxiety, yielding 156 effect sizes. We then performed meta-analytic structural equation modeling to simultaneously estimate all covariances and control for comorbidity. Again we found punishment sensitivity to predict depression (β = .37) and anxiety (β = .35), with reward sensitivity only predicting depression (β = -.07). The transdiagnostic role of punishment sensitivity and the discriminatory role of reward sensitivity support a hierarchical approach to RST and psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101842

Cites

410 of 410 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, B. A., Matanky, K., Aviram, G., & Yovel, I.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Katz, Benjamin A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
77
Pages
101842
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3009760869
Cited by
109
References
410
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation (886/18)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, punishment sensitivity, reward sensitivity, depression, anxiety, psychopathology, transdiagnostic mechanisms, comorbidities, symptom severity, remission
MeSH terms
Latent Class Analysis, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Punishment, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review