CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32Cognitive Abilities and TestingChild Welfare and AdoptionIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Are adoption gains on the g factor? A meta-analysis

te Nijenhuis, Jan, Jongeneel-Grimen, Birthe, Armstrong, Elijah L.·2015·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.022

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of a simplified procedure and a meta-analysis has already been successfully applied in several studies.

    “This combination of a simplified procedure and a meta-analysis has already been successfully applied in several studies, some of them often cited [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].”

    From Spearman’s Hypothesis Tested on Black Adults: A Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
te Nijenhuis, J., Jongeneel-Grimen, B., & Armstrong, E. L.
Affiliations
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
73
Pages
56-60
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.022
OpenAlex
W1993018759
Cited by
32
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
general intelligence, intelligence, adoption, IQ gains, heritability of intelligence, family socioeconomic status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review