The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensory-Processing Sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: Evidence of Vantage Sensitivity
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Objective Treatment effects of preventative mental health interventions for adolescents tend to be relatively small. One reason for the small effects may be individual differences in the response to psychological treatment as a function of inherent characteristics, a notion proposed in the concept of Vantage Sensitivity. The current study investigated whether the personality trait Sensory-Processing Sensitivity moderated the efficacy of a new school-based intervention aimed at the prevention of depression. Method Using a two-cohort treatment/control design with one cohort serving as the control group (N = 197) and a subsequent cohort as the treatment group (N = 166) it was tested whether Sensory-Processing Sensitivity predicted depression trajectories from pre-treatment up to a 12 months follow-up assessment in 11-year-old girls from an at-risk population in England. Results Sensory-Processing Sensitivity emerged as a significant predictor of treatment response. The prevention program successfully reduced depression scores in girls scoring high on Sensory-Processing Sensitivity but was not effective at all in girls scoring low on the same measure. Conclusions This study provides first empirical evidence for Vantage Sensitivity as a function of the personality trait Sensory-Processing Sensitivity regarding treatment response to a school-based depression prevention intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x · Cited by 10,854
Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0017376 · Cited by 3,039
Self-citationYoshikawa, H., Aber, J. L., & Beardslee, W. R. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0028015 · Cited by 1,090
Sensory Processing Sensitivity: A Review in the Light of the Evolution of Biological Responsivity
Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311434213 · Cited by 645
Stice, E., Shaw, H., Bohon, C., Marti, C. N., & Rohde, P. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015168 · Cited by 553 · cited 1×
“…average treatment effects tend to be modest at best (r = .11–.24) and treatment efficacy appears to vary as a function of intervention delivery and sample demographics (Brunwasser et al., 2009; Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor, & Schellinger, 2011; Horowitz & Garber, 2006; Stice et al., 2009).”
Time trends in adolescent mental health
Collishaw, S., Maughan, B., Goodman, R., & Pickles, A. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00335.x · Cited by 508
A meta-analytic review of the Penn Resiliency Program’s effect on depressive symptoms.
Brunwasser, S. M., Gillham, J. E., & Kim, E. S. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017671 · Cited by 428 · cited 1×
“…average treatment effects tend to be modest at best (r = .11–.24) and treatment efficacy appears to vary as a function of intervention delivery and sample demographics (Brunwasser et al., 2009; Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor, & Schellinger, 2011; Horowitz & Garber, 2006; Stice et al., 2009).”
Collishaw, S., Maughan, B., Natarajan, L., & Pickles, A. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02252.x · Cited by 267
Chen, C., Chen, C., Moyzis, R., Stern, H., He, Q., Li, H., Li, J., Zhu, B., & Dong, Q. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021636 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Individual Differences in Environmental Sensitivity
Pluess, M. (2015) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12120 · Cited by 549
Self-citationPluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000406 · Cited by 344
Self-citationTakahashi, T., Kawashima, I., Nitta, Y., & Kumano, H. (2020) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294119841848 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Pluess, M., & Boniwell, I.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 40-45
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032045546
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensory-Processing Sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: Evidence of Vantage Sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.011
- The paper
- Pluess, M., & Boniwell, I. (2015). Sensory-Processing Sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: Evidence of Vantage Sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
