The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Differences in Environmental Sensitivity
Abstract
A fundamental trait found in most organisms is the ability to register, process, and respond to external factors. Although such environmental sensitivity is critical for adapting successfully to contextual conditions, individuals tend to differ in their sensitivity to the environment, with some more sensitive than others. Such differences in environmental sensitivity can be seen across many species, including humans. Although the notion of variability in environmental sensitivity is reflected indirectly in many traditional concepts of human psychology, several new frameworks address individual differences in environmental sensitivity more directly and from a perspective of developmental and evolutionary theory. In this article, I integrate these perspectives into a broad meta-framework before proposing ideas for research on individual differences in environmental sensitivity. I also emphasize that inter-individual variability in environmental sensitivity be considered in both theoretical and applied work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0017376 · Cited by 3,039
Self-citationCoping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., De Jong, I. C., Ruis, M. A. W., & Blokhuis, H. J. (1999) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3 · Cited by 2,999 · cited 1×
“These two prototypical behavioral types have been described as hawks and doves, reflecting two different behavioral strategies—proactive versus reactive coping (2)—that evolved over time, each characterized by specific advantages and disad-”
BackgroundMonroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.406 · Cited by 2,143
BOYCE, W. T., & ELLIS, B. J. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050145 · Cited by 2,078
Differential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary--neurodevelopmental theory
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000611 · Cited by 1,564
For Better and For Worse: Differential Susceptibility to Environmental Influences
Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00525.x · Cited by 1,515
The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity
Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B. J., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.11.007 · Cited by 1,373
Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene×environment interactions
Meaney, M. J. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01381.x · Cited by 1,239
Korte, S. M., Koolhaas, J. M., Wingfield, J. C., & McEwen, B. S. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.08.009 · Cited by 1,097
Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes?
Belsky, J., Jonassaint, C., Pluess, M., Stanton, M., Brummett, B., & Williams, R. (2009) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2009.44 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Aron, 1996, The highly sensitive person: How to thrive when the world overwhelms you
- Szyf, Genetics of psychological well-being
Cited by
Price, C. J., & Hooven, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00798 · Cited by 519
“…SRS amplifies the signal coming from the environment and maximizes the chance an individual will be modified by that experience; the costs may include being hypersensitive to social criticism or becoming interrupted or overwhelmed by minor challenging events (Blair and Raver, 2012; Pluess, 2015).”
BackgroundDevelopmental Adaptation to Stress: An Evolutionary Perspective
Ellis, B. J., & Del Giudice, M. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011732 · Cited by 429
Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000406 · Cited by 344
Self-citationAdolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context
Schriber, R. A., & Guyer, A. E. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.009 · Cited by 246
The role of epigenetics in psychological resilience
Smeeth, D., Beck, S., Karam, E. G., & Pluess, M. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30515-0 · Cited by 108
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pluess, M.
- Venue
- Child Development Perspectives
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-08-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 138-143
- ISSN
- 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-8606
- OpenAlex
- W2117970611
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 33.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual Differences in Environmental Sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cdep.12120
- The paper
- Pluess, M. (2015). Individual Differences in Environmental Sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
