CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 65Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessCognitive Abilities and Testing

Emotional, behavioral and social difficulties among high-IQ children during the preschool period: Results of the EDEN mother–child cohort

Peyre, Hugo, Ramus, Franck, Melchior, Maria, Forhan, Anne, Heude, Barbara, Gauvrit, Nicolas·2016·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.014

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peyre et al. found no significant differences in internalizing and externalizing problems between gifted and non-gifted preschool children.

    “Using the SDQ, the authors investigated the presence of internalizing and externalizing problems as well. No significant differences with the control group emerged again.”

    From Behavioral and Socio-Emotional Disorders in Intellectual Giftedness: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

  • Peyre et al. found no between-group differences in peer relationships and prosocial behaviors between gifted and non-gifted preschool children.

    “They did not find between-group differences in items investigating peer relationships (e.g., isolation and ability to relate to peers compared to adults) and prosocial behaviors (e.g., consideration of others, willingness to comfort others).”

    From Behavioral and Socio-Emotional Disorders in Intellectual Giftedness: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

  • According to parents' reports (SDQ), no differences between the gifted and control group in peer relationships and prosocial behaviors emerged in the preschool study.

    “According to parents’ reports (in the SDQ), no differences between the gifted and control group in peer relationships and prosocial behaviors emerged in this study.”

    From Behavioral and Socio-Emotional Disorders in Intellectual Giftedness: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

  • One included study added a group with learning disabilities, and another added a group with intellectual disability.

    “One study added a group with learning disabilities [28], whereas another study added a group with intellectual disability [30].”

    From Behavioral and Socio-Emotional Disorders in Intellectual Giftedness: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

  • Peyre et al. found no association between intellectual giftedness and anxiety or depressive symptoms in 5-6 year old children.

    “In 5–6 years old children, Peyre et al. [30] found no association between intellectual giftedness and anxiety or depressive symptoms, rated by parents in the SDQ.”

    From Behavioral and Socio-Emotional Disorders in Intellectual Giftedness: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Peyre, H., Ramus, F., Melchior, M., Forhan, A., Heude, B., & Gauvrit, N.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR)
Corresponding author
Peyre, Hugo
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
94
Pages
366-371
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.014
OpenAlex
W2278740674
Cited by
65
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for medical research
  • National Agency for Research
  • National Institute for Research in Public health
  • French Ministry of Health
  • French Ministry of Research
  • INSERM Bone and Joint Diseases National Research (PRO-A) and Human Nutrition National Research Programs
  • Paris–Sud University
  • Nestlé
  • French National Institute for Population Health Surveillance
  • French National Institute for Health Education
  • European Union FP7 programs (FP7/2007-2013)
  • Diabetes National Research Program
  • French Agency for Environmental Health Safety
  • Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale a complementary health insurance
  • French national agency for food security
  • French speaking association for the study of diabetes and metabolism
  • ANR (ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC, ANR-11-0001-02 PSL*, ANR-12-DSSA-0005-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
high IQ, gifted children, emotional problems, behavioral problems, social difficulties, preschool children, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, prosocial behavior, EDEN mother-child cohort, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, WPPSI-III, cognitive development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review