Cited by 167Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis

Annisette, Logan E., Lafreniere, Kathryn D.·2017·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The empirical findings support Annisette and Lafreniere's (2017) Shallowing Hypothesis.

    “These empirical findings support Annisette and Lafreniere's (2017) Shallowing Hypothesis, which had previously been based on self-reports.”
  • According to the shallow hypothesis, frequent use of ultra-brief social media promotes rapid and relatively shallow thought, associated with cognitive and moral shallowness.

    “According to the shallow hypothesis (Annisette & Lafreniere, 2017; Carr, 2010) the frequent use of ultra-brief social media promotes rapid and relatively shallow thought, associated with cognitive and moral shallowness.”
  • The shallowing hypothesis emphasizes that the superficial way in which people tend to interact with new forms of digital reading may not support readers' engagement or further development of higher-order cognitive skills.

    “An alternative explanation could rely on the shallowing hypothesis (Annisette & Lafreniere, 2017; Carr, 2010), which emphasizes that the superficial way in which people tend to interact with new forms of digital reading may not support readers' engagement or further development of higher-order cognitive skills.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D.
Affiliations
University of Windsor (CA)
Corresponding author
Annisette, Logan E.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
115
Pages
154-158
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2288901345
Cited by
167
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
social media use, reflective thinking, Big Five personality traits, life goals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review