Cited by 67Digital Media and PhilosophyMedia, Communication, and EducationDigital Education and Society

Know what? How digital technologies undermine learning and remembering

Baron, Naomi S.·2021·Journal of Pragmatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.011

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baron, N. S.
Affiliations
American University (US)
Corresponding author
Baron, Naomi S.
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
175
Pages
27-37
ISSN
0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126747705
Cited by
67
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Pragmatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media, Communication, and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
Keywords
digital technologies, cognitive skills, internet use, memory, GPS navigation, spatial navigation, digital reading, print reading, dementia, teaching practice, informal learning, formal learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review