Cited by 36Emotional Intelligence and PerformancePersonality Traits and PsychologySocial Skills and Education

Psychometric properties of the Italian trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (I-TEIQue)

Open access
Di Fabio, Annamaria, Saklofske, Donald H., Tremblay, Paul F.·2016·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Di Fabio, A., Saklofske, D. H., & Tremblay, P. F.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
96
Pages
198-201
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294383794
Cited by
36
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
Keywords
trait emotional intelligence, TEIQue, Italian adaptation, psychometric properties, factor structure, reliability statistics, Emotional Quotient Inventory, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, Big Five personality traits, young adults, cross-cultural adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review