Cited by 29Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Process and change in cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic pain

Morley, Stephen·2004·Pain

Abstract

Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK ∗Tel.: +44-113-343-2733; fax: +44-113-243-3719 E-mail: [email protected] Submitted January 20, 2004; accepted February 2, 2004. ☆ See related article by Nielson and Jensen. Pages 233 to 241 of this issue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.008

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morley, S.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Morley, Stephen
Venue
Pain
Published
2004-06
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
205-206
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065876855
Cited by
29
References
11
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic pain, treatment process, therapeutic change, pain management
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Models, Neurological, Pain, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review