The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic pain and frequent use of health care
Abstract
Little is known about the relationship between chronic pain status and overall use of healthcare. We examined whether disabling chronic pain was associated with more frequent use of healthcare in three settings: primary care, emergency departments, and hospital admissions. We used data from Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI) of 17,543 residents in New South Wales, Australia aged 16 and over who were randomly sampled using a population-based two-stage stratified sample and random digit dialing methods. The overall response rate was 70.8%. Compared to chronic pain respondents with no or limited pain-related disability, those with most pain-related disability reported more: primary care visits in the last 2 weeks and last 12 months (adjusted mean number of visits 0.59 vs 0.40 and 10.72 vs 4.81, both P < 0.005); hospital admissions (0.46 vs 0.18, P < 0.005); and emergency department visits (0.85 vs 0.17, P > 0.005). In modelling, having chronic pain per se, or having chronic pain with any level of activity interference predicted health care use after adjusting for age, gender, self-rated health, psychological distress, comorbidity and access to care. Higher levels of pain-related disability predicted health care use more than other pain status variables. There was a strong association between pain-related disability and greater use of services. Further work is needed to understand the nature of this association. Given the fluctuating course of chronic pain over time, there is a significant segment of the population that may be at risk of developing higher levels of disability associated with increased use of services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
KESSLER, R. C., ANDREWS, G., COLPE, L. J., HIRIPI, E., MROCZEK, D. K., NORMAND, S.-L. T., WALTERS, E. E., & ZASLAVSKY, A. M. (2002) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291702006074 · Cited by 10,327
Societal and Individual Determinants of Medical Care Utilization in the United States
Andersen, R., & Newman, J. F. (1973) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society · doi:10.2307/3349613 · Cited by 2,838
FURUKAWA, T. A., KESSLER, R. C., SLADE, T., & ANDREWS, G. (2003) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291702006700 · Cited by 1,570
Andersson, H. I., Ejlertsson, G., Leden, I., & Scherstén, B. (1999) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.53.8.503 · Cited by 183
The Validity of Self-reported Physician Utilization Measures
Cleary, P. D., & Jette, A. M. (1984) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198409000-00003 · Cited by 163
Cited by
A review of chronic pain impact on patients, their social environment and the health care system
Duenas, M., Ojeda, B., Salazar, A., Mico, J. A., & Failde, I. (2016) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s105892 · Cited by 985
“62,64,65,67 In Sweden 68 and the USA, 69 age, pain severity, poor self-rated health, comorbidity, psychological distress, and access to health care were the main determinants of medical visits.”
BackgroundEpidemiology of Chronic Pain with Psychological Comorbidity: Prevalence, Risk, Course, and Prognosis
Tunks, E. R., Crook, J., & Weir, R. (2008) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370805300403 · Cited by 323
Rayner, L., Hotopf, M., Petkova, H., Matcham, F., Simpson, A., & McCracken, L. M. (2016) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000542 · Cited by 290
Mejdahl, M. K., Andersen, K. G., Gartner, R., Kroman, N., & Kehlet, H. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f1865 · Cited by 258
Beatty, L., & Lambert, S. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.004 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Blyth, F. M., March, L. M., Brnabic, A. J. M., & Cousins, M. J.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-58
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008674628
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic pain and frequent use of health care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.020
- The paper
- Blyth, F. M., March, L. M., Brnabic, A. J. M., & Cousins, M. J. (2004). Chronic pain and frequent use of health care. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.