The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of a screener and opioid assessment measure for patients with chronic pain
Abstract
There has been a need for a brief assessment tool for providers who treat chronic pain patients to determine potential risk of abuse when prescribed opioids for pain. The purpose of this study was to develop and begin the validation of a self-administered screening tool (Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain, SOAPP) for chronic pain patients considered for long-term opioid therapy. A consensus of 26 pain and addiction experts was obtained on important characteristics of chronic pain patients that predict future medication misuse using concept mapping. A 24-item SOAPP (version 1.0) was developed based on this consensus and was administered to 175 patients who were taking opioids for chronic pain. After 6 months, 95 of these patients were re-evaluated. Validation of the SOAPP was conducted by identifying those patients exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior as determined by any of the following: a positive score on the Prescription Drug Use Questionnaire (PDUQ) interview, positive urine toxicology screen, and/or ratings by staff as to whether patients had a serious drug problem. Of the original 24 items, 14 SOAPP items appeared to predict subsequent aberrant behaviors. Coefficient alpha for these 14 items was acceptable for a short scale (0.74). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.881 (P<0.001), suggesting adequate sensitivity and specificity for a screening device. These reliability and predictive validity results suggest that the SOAPP is a promising step toward screening risk potential for substance misuse among persons with chronic pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide
Ware, J. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,424
Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency
Streiner, D. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8001_18 · Cited by 3,794
Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-825_9 · Cited by 3,476
Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach
Stewart, A., & Ware, J. (1992) · doi:10.7249/cb361 · Cited by 2,689
The CAGE Questionnaire: Validation of a New Alcoholism Screening Instrument
MAYFIELD, D., MCLEOD, G., & HALL, P. (1974) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.131.10.1121 · Cited by 2,249
An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation
Trochim, W. M. K. (1989) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5 · Cited by 1,512
Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores.
Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0048070 · Cited by 1,207
Being Inconsistent About Consistency: When Coefficient Alpha Does and Doesn't Matter
Streiner, D. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8003_01 · Cited by 1,070
Substance Abuse: A Comprehensive Textbook
Lowinson, J. H. (1992) · Cited by 908
Concept Mapping as an Alternative Approach for the Analysis of Open-Ended Survey Responses
Jackson, K. M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2002) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442802237114 · Cited by 733
Cited by
Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain
Chou, R., Fanciullo, G. J., Fine, P. G., Adler, J. A., Ballantyne, J. C., Davies, P., Donovan, M. I., Fishbain, D. A., Foley, K. M., Fudin, J., et al. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.008 · Cited by 2,192
Development and validation of the Current Opioid Misuse Measure
Butler, S. F., Budman, S. H., Fernandez, K. C., Houle, B., Benoit, C., Katz, N., & Jamison, R. N. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.014 · Cited by 651
Self-citationValidation of the Revised Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain (SOAPP-R)
Butler, S. F., Fernandez, K., Benoit, C., Budman, S. H., & Jamison, R. N. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.11.014 · Cited by 471
Self-citationAddiction to opioids in chronic pain patients: A literature review
Højsted, J., & Sjøgren, P. (2007) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.08.004 · Cited by 424
Management of Persistent Pain in the Older Patient: A Clinical Review
Makris, U. E., Abrams, R. C., Gurland, B., & Reid, M. C. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.9405 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, S. F., Budman, S. H., Fernandez, K., & Jamison, R. N.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-75
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131826103
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a screener and opioid assessment measure for patients with chronic pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.026
- The paper
- Butler, S. F., Budman, S. H., Fernandez, K., & Jamison, R. N. (2004). Validation of a screener and opioid assessment measure for patients with chronic pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.