The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain
Open accessAbstract
It is widely accepted that the unique painful and non-painful sensations in neuropathic pain are the result of particular mechanisms, and that specific management strategies for neuropathic pain should be applied to tackle them. Ideally, the treatment of chronic pain should be directed at eliminating the cause of pain, but in reality this is rarely possible. The management of chronic pain is therefore often limited to reducing the intensity of such pain and associated symptoms. Pain is essentially a subjective phenomenon described with patient-specific symptoms and expressed with a certain intensity. It therefore makes sense to examine the value of verbal descriptors and pain qualities as a basis for distinguishing neuropathic pain from other types of chronic pain. Work by Dubuisson and Melzack (1976) and later by Boureau et al. (1990) supported anecdotal opinion that key words might be discriminatory for neuropathic pain. In the last 5 years, much research has been undertaken to develop screening tools for this purpose. These tools are based on verbal pain description with, or without, limited bedside testing. This paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of such tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Freynhagen, R., Baron, R., Gockel, U., & Tölle, T. R. (2006) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/030079906x132488 · Cited by 2,280 · cited 4×
“painDETECT was developed and validated in German (Freynhagen et al., 2005, 2006) and incorporates an easy to use patient-based (self-report) questionnaire with 9 items that do not require a clinical examination.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationBennett, M. I., Smith, B. H., Torrance, N., & Lee, A. J. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.002 · Cited by 169
Self-citation
Cited by
Neuropathic pain: diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment
Baron, R., Binder, A., & Wasner, G. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70143-5 · Cited by 1,816
Self-citationNeuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice
Finnerup, N. B., Haroutounian, S., Kamerman, P., Baron, R., Bennett, D. L. H., Bouhassira, D., Cruccu, G., Freeman, R., Hansson, P., Nurmikko, T., et al. (2016) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492 · Cited by 1,332
Self-citationNeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment
Haanpää, M., Attal, N., Backonja, M., Baron, R., Bennett, M., Bouhassira, D., Cruccu, G., Hansson, P., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Iannetti, G. D., et al. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.031 · Cited by 1,060
Self-citationDworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Revicki, D. A., Harding, G., Coyne, K. S., Peirce-Sandner, S., Bhagwat, D., Everton, D., Burke, L. B., Cowan, P., et al. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.007 · Cited by 761
Management of Musculoskeletal Pain: An Update with Emphasis on Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
El-Tallawy, S. N., Nalamasu, R., Salem, G. I., LeQuang, J. A. K., Pergolizzi, J. V., & Christo, P. J. (2021) · Pain and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40122-021-00235-2 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, M. I., Attal, N., Backonja, M. M., Baron, R., Bouhassira, D., Freynhagen, R., Scholz, J., Tölle, T. R., Wittchen, H.-U., & Jensen, T. S.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 199-203
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981120831
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.034
- The paper
- Bennett, M. I., Attal, N., Backonja, M. M., Baron, R., Bouhassira, D., Freynhagen, R., Scholz, J., Tölle, T. R., Wittchen, H.-U., & Jensen, T. S. (2007). Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
