The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized controlled trial of an Internet-delivered family cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention for children and adolescents with chronic pain.
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions show promise for decreasing chronic pain in youth. However, the availability of CBT is limited by many factors including distance to major treatment centers and expense. This study evaluates a more accessible treatment approach for chronic pediatric pain using an Internet-delivered family CBT intervention. Participants included 48 children, aged 11-17 years, with chronic headache, abdominal, or musculoskeletal pain and associated functional disability, and their parents. Children were randomly assigned to a wait-list control group or an Internet treatment group. Primary treatment outcomes were pain intensity ratings (0-10 NRS) and activity limitations on the Child Activity Limitations Interview, both completed via an online daily diary. In addition to their medical care, the Internet treatment group completed 8 weeks of online modules including relaxation training, cognitive strategies, parent operant techniques, communication strategies, and sleep and activity interventions. Youth randomized to the wait-list control group continued with the current medical care only. Findings demonstrated significantly greater reduction in activity limitations and pain intensity at post-treatment for the Internet treatment group and these effects were maintained at the three-month follow-up. Rate of clinically significant improvement in pain was also greater for the Internet treatment group than for the wait-list control group. There were no significant group differences in parental protectiveness or child depressive symptoms post-treatment. Internet treatment was rated as acceptable by all children and parents. Findings support the efficacy and acceptability of Internet delivery of family CBT for reducing pain and improving function among children and adolescents with chronic pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Pilot data demonstrated that internet-delivered pain management reduced barriers of access to care and was effective at reducing pain-related disability [121].”
From Best-evidence for the rehabilitation of chronic pain part 1: Pediatric pain (2019) · cites this paper as [121]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Several cognitive-behavioral oriented Internet interventions have been studied for use with chronic pain (e.g., [14; 10; 46])”
From Internet-enhanced management of fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial (2010) · cites this paper as [46]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, CCBT has been used for 25 different clinical disorders [27], not only mental health conditions [59-62].”
From Computerized cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety and depression in rural areas:a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Moher, D. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.15.1987 · Cited by 2,545
Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience
Perquin, C. W., Hazebroek-Kampschreur, A. A. J. M., Hunfeld, J. A. M., Bohnen, A. M., van Suijlekom-Smit, L. W. A., Passchier, J., & van der Wouden, J. C. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00269-4 · Cited by 1,114
Psychometric properties of the revised child anxiety and depression scale in a clinical sample
Chorpita, B. F., Moffitt, C. E., & Gray, J. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.004 · Cited by 905 · cited 2×
“As a measure of emotional functioning, children completed the major depressive disorder (MDD) subscale of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale [2] (RCADS).”
BackgroundMethodMcGrath, P. J., Walco, G. A., Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Brown, M. T., Davidson, K., Eccleston, C., Finley, G. A., Goldschneider, K., Haverkos, L., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007 · Cited by 851 · cited 2×
“Following recommendations of the PedIMMPACT group [18], we sought to assess multiple, relevant outcome domains that have been evaluated in face-to-face CBT studies including pain intensity, physical functioning (activity limitations), and emotional functioning (depressive symptoms).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPsychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
Eccleston, C., Palermo, T. M., Williams, A. C. D. C., Lewandowski Holley, A., Morley, S., Fisher, E., & Law, E. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003968.pub4 · Cited by 745
Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & Andersson, G. (2008) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9144-1 · Cited by 555
PALERMO, T. M. (2000) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/00004703-200002000-00011 · Cited by 494
Chronic pain and its impact on quality of life in adolescents and their families
Hunfeld, J. A. M. (2001) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/26.3.145 · Cited by 421
Development of a modified treatment evaluation inventory
Kelley, M. L., Heffer, R. W., Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1989) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf00960495 · Cited by 409
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Persuasive System Design Does Matter: a Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-based Interventions
Kelders, S. M., Kok, R. N., Ossebaard, H. C., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2104 · Cited by 1,308
Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological therapies for children with chronic pain
Fisher, E., Heathcote, L., Palermo, T. M., de C Williams, A. C., Lau, J., & Eccleston, C. (2014) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu008 · Cited by 710
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
Eccleston, C., Palermo, T. M., Williams, A. C. D. C., Lewandowski Holley, A., Morley, S., Fisher, E., & Law, E. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003968.pub4 · Cited by 745
Palermo, T. M., Eccleston, C., Lewandowski, A. S., de C. Williams, A. C., & Morley, S. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.004 · Cited by 489
Self-citationFamily and parent influences on pediatric chronic pain: a developmental perspective
Palermo, T. M., Valrie, C. R., & Karlson, C. W. (2014) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0035216 · Cited by 426
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Palermo, T. M., Wilson, A. C., Peters, M., Lewandowski, A., & Somhegyi, H.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- George Fox University (US)
- Lewis & Clark College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Palermo, Tonya M.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-213
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2760656
- OpenAlex
- W2088188917
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 20.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD050674, R21HD050674, K24HD060068)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- online intervention, children and adolescents, headache, abdominal pain, musculoskeletal pain, activity limitation, pain intensity, relaxation training, treatment acceptability, functional disability
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Socioeconomic Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Sample Size, Internet, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
