Cited by 426Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesFamily Support in IllnessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Family and parent influences on pediatric chronic pain: a developmental perspective

Open access
Palermo, Tonya M., Valrie, Cecelia R., Karlson, Cynthia W.·2014·American Psychologist

Abstract

Pain that recurs or persists is unfortunately a common experience for children. One of the unique considerations in pediatric chronic pain management is the bidirectional influences of children's pain experiences and parental and family factors. In this review we present a developmental perspective on understanding pediatric chronic pain and disability, highlighting factors relevant from infancy to adolescence, and family and parent influences. Preliminary evidence indicates that developmental processes are influenced and may also shape the pediatric pain experience. Parent emotions, behaviors, and health also play a role in children's pain experiences, where overly protective parent behaviors, increased distress, and history of chronic pain are important parent-level influences. Research on family-level influences has revealed that families of children with chronic pain have poorer family functioning (e.g., more conflict, less cohesion) than families of healthy children. Several important gaps exist in this research, such as in understanding basic developmental processes in children with chronic pain and how they influence children's perception of and responses to pain. Also, there is a lack of longitudinal data on family relationships and individual adjustment to allow for understanding of whether changes occur in parenting over the course of the child's chronic pain experience. Although parent interventions have been successfully incorporated into many cognitive-behavioral treatments for children with chronic pain conditions, little guidance exists for adapting intervention strategies to be developmentally appropriate. Additional research is needed to examine whether parent interventions are effective at different developmental stages and the best way to incorporate developmental goals into treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0035216

Cites

83 of 85 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parental overprotective behaviour can increase distress and disability in young people with FSS.

    “parental overprotective behaviour can increase distress and disability in the young [18–21]”

    From Feasibility of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents (AHEAD) with multiple functional somatic syndromes: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

    In “Parent Emotions and Behaviors” (page unavailable), the paper says protective parental responses are related to increased disability in children with recurrent or chronic pain. It does not establish that those responses increase the young people’s distress, and the reported relationship does not establish causation. The passage is not specific to young people with functional somatic symptoms (FSS). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In children and adolescents with FSS, several studies support that parents inadvertently may play a role in reinforcement of maladaptive illness behaviours and beliefs.

    “In children and adolescents with FSS, this is supported by the findings of several studies, where parents inadvertently may play a role in reinforcement of maladaptive illness behaviours and beliefs [19, 20, 92, 93].”

    From Feasibility of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents (AHEAD) with multiple functional somatic syndromes: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Conceptual Framework section (page not provided) says parental attention may inadvertently reinforce maladaptive pain and coping behaviors, including activity restriction and catastrophizing. The Parent Emotions and Behaviors section reports several studies linking solicitous parental responses to disability. The paper focuses on pediatric chronic pain, however, and does not establish the claim for children and adolescents with FSS generally or explicitly describe reinforcement of illness beliefs. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Parents play an essential role in their children's experience of pain, their treatment, and potential treatment outcomes.

    “Parents play an essential role in their children's experience of pain, their treatment, and potential treatment outcomes (Donnelly et al., 2020;Harbeck-Weber et al., 2022;Palermo et al., 2014;Simons et al., 2016).”
  • Reinterpreting pain sensations shows weak correlations with functional variables such as pain interference and physical disability.

    “it shows weak correlations with functional variables such as pain interference and physical disability 281, 284–287.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Allen K Matthews J 1998 Behavioral management of recurrent pain in children Watson T Gresham F Handbook of child behavior therapy NY Plenum Press
  2. Goodman JE McGrath PJ Forward SP 1997 Aggregation of pain complaints and pain-related disability and handicap in a community sample of families. Pain Research and Management Jensen TS Turner JA Wiesenfeld-Halleb Z Progress in pain research and management: Vol. 8. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Pain 1 10 Seattle, WA IASP

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palermo, T. M., Valrie, C. R., & Karlson, C. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2014
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
142-152
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2335484472
Cited by
426
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
25.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL103155)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K24HD060068)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
pediatric chronic pain, family influence, parental influence, developmental perspective, parental distress, family functioning, family conflict, family cohesion, cognitive-behavioral intervention, developmental appropriateness, children with disabilities
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Family, Humans, Infant, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Stress, Psychological, Adolescent Development, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review