Cited by 109Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

Spinal antinociceptive effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition during inflammation: Involvement of prostaglandins and endocannabinoids

Telleria-Diaz, Alejandro, Schmidt, Martin, Kreusch, Stefan, Neubert, Anne-Kathrin, Schache, Florian, Vazquez, Enrique, Vanegas, Horacio, Schaible, Hans-Georg +1 more·2010·Pain

Abstract

Both cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 are expressed in the spinal cord, and the spinal COX product prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) contributes to the generation of central sensitization upon peripheral inflammation. Vice versa spinal COX inhibition is considered an important mechanism of antihyperalgesic pain treatment. Recently, however, COX-2 was shown to be also involved in the metabolism of endocannabinoids. Because endocannabinoids can have analgesic actions it is conceivable that inhibition of spinal COX produces analgesia not only by inhibition of PG synthesis but also by inhibition of endocannabinoid breakdown. In the present study, we recorded from spinal cord neurons with input from the inflamed knee joint and we measured the spinal release of PGE(2) and the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) in vivo, using the same stimulation procedures. COX inhibitors were applied spinally. Selective COX-1, selective COX-2 and non-selective COX inhibitors attenuated the generation of spinal hyperexcitability when applied before and during development of inflammation but, when inflammation and spinal hyperexcitability were established, only selective COX-2 inhibitors reversed spinal hyperexcitability. During established inflammation all COX inhibitors reduced release of spinal PGE(2) almost equally but only the COX-2 inhibitor prevented breakdown of 2-AG. The reversal of spinal hyperexcitability by COX-2 inhibitors was prevented or partially reversed by AM-251, an antagonist at the cannabinoid-1 receptor. We conclude that inhibition of spinal COX-2 not only reduces PG production but also endocannabinoid breakdown and provide evidence that reversal of inflammation-evoked spinal hyperexcitability by COX-2 inhibitors is more related to endocannabinoidergic mechanisms than to inhibition of spinal PG synthesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific COX-2 inhibitors could act centrally to reduce hyperalgesia by preventing 2-AG breakdown into pro-nociceptive molecules.

    “Thus, specific COX-2 inhibitors, which alleviate endometriosis-associated pain [12], could, as has recently been shown, act centrally to reduce hyperalgesia by preventing 2-AG breakdown into pro-nociceptive molecules [7,47,50].”

    From Endocannabinoid involvement in endometriosis. (2010) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Telleria-Diaz, A., Schmidt, M., Kreusch, S., Neubert, A.-K., Schache, F., Vazquez, E., Vanegas, H., Schaible, H.-G., & Ebersberger, A.
Affiliations
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
  • Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (VE)
Corresponding author
Ebersberger, Andrea
Venue
Pain
Published
2010-01
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
26-35
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035340550
Cited by
109
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Keywords
cyclooxygenase inhibition, cyclooxygenase-2, cyclooxygenase-1, prostaglandin E2, endocannabinoids, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, spinal hyperexcitability, central sensitization, inflammatory pain, cannabinoid 1 receptor, AM251, spinal cord neurons, knee joint inflammation
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Arachidonic Acids, Arthritis, Experimental, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Administration Routes, Enzyme Inhibitors, Glycerides, Indans, Injections, Spinal, Knee Joint, Male, Neurons, Pain Measurement, Physical Stimulation, Piperidines, Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases, Pyrazoles, Spinal Cord, Dinoprostone, Rats, Wistar, Statistics, Nonparametric, Rats, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review