Cited by 344Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPain Mechanisms and Treatments

On the definitions and physiology of back pain, referred pain, and radicular pain

Bogduk, Nikolai·2009·Pain

Abstract

University of Newcastle, Newcastle Bone and Joint Institute, Royal Newcastle Centre, PO Box 664J, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia *Tel.: +61 2 49223505; fax: +61 2 49 223559. E-mail address:[email protected]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.020

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bogduk, N.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Bogduk, Nikolai
Venue
Pain
Published
2009-12
Volume
147
Issue
1
Pages
17-19
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067381900
Cited by
344
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
back pain, referred pain, radicular pain, definitions, pathophysiology, sciatica
MeSH terms
Back Pain, Humans, Radiculopathy, Referred Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review