Cited by 49Cancer survivorship and carePancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchNursing care and research

Pancreatic cancer: Patient and caregiver perceptions on diagnosis, psychological impact, and importance of support

Engebretson, Anitra, Matrisian, Lynn, Thompson, Cara·2015·Pancreatology

Abstract

Background/objectives Pancreatic cancer (PC) can have an enormous psychological toll on those affected by it. This study evaluated patient and caregiver perceptions about diagnosis and daily life with PC. Methods The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) administered a 25-min online survey (funded by Celgene) between July 30 and September 18, 2013 to patients with PC and caregivers whose loved ones were alive or had died within the past 6 months. Results There were 397 respondents (all in the US) including 184 patients (81 with metastatic disease) and 213 caregivers (145 with loved ones with metastatic disease); 80% of patients reported having a primary caregiver. Over 90% reported symptoms before diagnosis, the most common of which being acute abdominal pain, pain radiating into the back, and fatigue. Gastroenterologists were the diagnosing physician in 36.3% of cases. The mean duration from symptom onset to diagnosis was 2.4 months. The most common action taken by diagnosing physicians was referral to another physician (57.7%). No treatments were offered for 9% of patients with nonmetastatic disease and 17% of patients with metastatic disease. The most commonly reported caregiver roles were providing support on treatment days and talking to physicians. A greater percentage of caregivers than patients recognized the various roles played by caregivers. Patients aware of the PanCAN Patient and Liaison Services (PALS) program reported fewer negative emotions than PALS-unawa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pan.2015.05.471

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engebretson, A., Matrisian, L., & Thompson, C.
Affiliations
  • Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (US)
  • Celgene (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Engebretson, Anitra
Venue
Pancreatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
701-707
ISSN
1424-3903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W586849473
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pancreatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Celgene Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, patient perspectives, caregiver perceptions, psychological impact, diagnosis, metastatic disease, caregiver role, support services, negative emotions, gastroenterologist referral
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Data Collection, Family, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review