Cited by 34Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and carePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Acceptance and commitment therapy for patient fatigue interference and caregiver burden in advanced gastrointestinal cancer: Results of a pilot randomized trial

Open access
Mosher, Catherine E, Secinti, Ekin, Wu, Wei, Kashy, Deborah A, Kroenke, Kurt, Bricker, Jonathan B, Helft, Paul R, Turk, Anita A +5 more·2022·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Fatigue often interferes with functioning in patients with advanced cancer, resulting in increased family caregiver burden. Acceptance and commitment therapy, a promising intervention for cancer-related suffering, has rarely been applied to dyads coping with advanced cancer. Aim: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for patient-caregiver dyads coping with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Primary outcomes were patient fatigue interference and caregiver burden. Design: In this pilot trial, dyads were randomized to six weekly sessions of telephone-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy or education/support, an attention control. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention. Setting/participants: Forty patients with stage III–IV gastrointestinal cancer and fatigue interference and family caregivers with burden or distress were recruited from two oncology clinics and randomized. Results: The eligibility screening rate (54%) and retention rate (81% at 2 weeks post-intervention) demonstrated feasibility. At 2 weeks post-intervention, acceptance and commitment therapy participants reported high intervention helpfulness (mean = 4.25/5.00). Group differences in outcomes were not statistically significant. However, when examining within-group change, acceptance and commitment therapy patients showed moderate decline in fatigue interference at both follow-ups, whereas education/support patients did not show improvement at either follow-up. Acceptance and commitment therapy caregivers showed medium decline in burden at 2 weeks that was not sustained at 3 months, whereas education/support caregivers showed little change in burden. Conclusions: Acceptance and commitment therapy showed strong feasibility, acceptability, and promise and warrants further testing. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04010227. Registered 8 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04010227?term=catherine+mosher&draw=2&rank=1

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02692163221099610

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]McFarland DC and Breitbart WS. Gastrointestinal cancers. In: Breitbart WS, Butow PN, Jacobsen PB, (eds) Psycho-Oncology. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 189– 195.
  2. [67]Kenny D, Kashy D and Cook W. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press, 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mosher, C. E., Secinti, E., Wu, W., Kashy, D. A., Kroenke, K., Bricker, J. B., Helft, P. R., Turk, A. A., Loehrer, P. J., Sehdev, A., Al-Hader, A. A., Champion, V. L., & Johns, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mosher, Catherine E
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2022-05-30
Volume
36
Issue
7
Pages
1104-1117
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W4281634502
Cited by
34
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
national cancer institute (R21CA235788)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, cancer-related fatigue, fatigue interference, caregiver burden, advanced gastrointestinal cancer, patient-caregiver dyads, telephone-delivered intervention, feasibility and acceptability, family caregivers, palliative care
MeSH terms
Caregiver Burden, Fatigue, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Humans, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review