Cited by 114Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionNeurological disorders and treatmentsParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

A comparison of clinical and objective measures of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease

Open access
Morris, Tiffany R., Cho, Catherine, Dilda, Valentina, Shine, James M., Naismith, Sharon L., Lewis, Simon J.G., Moore, Steven T.·2012·Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Abstract

Freezing of gait, a paroxysmal motor block, is common in the latter stages of Parkinson's disease. The current 'gold standard' of assessing the severity of freezing is based on clinical identification (by up to 3 raters) of the number of episodes from video. The aims of this study were to systematically assess this 'gold standard' across multiple Parkinson's disease centers, and to compare these clinical ratings with objective measures derived from lower limb acceleration data. Video recordings were acquired during a timed up-and-go task from 10 Parkinson's disease patients (with a clinical history of freezing) in the 'off' state. Patients were instrumented with accelerometers on the lateral aspect of each shank. Ten experienced clinicians were recruited from four Parkinson's disease centers to independently assess the videos for number and duration of freezing events. The reliability of clinical video assessment for number of freezing events was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.63). Percent time frozen (cumulative duration of freezing episodes/total duration of the walking task) demonstrated stronger agreement between raters (0.73). Agreement of accelerometry-derived measures of freezing severity with mean clinician ratings was strong for number of episodes (0.78) and very strong for percent time frozen (0.93). The results demonstrate the viability of objective measures of freezing, and that percent time frozen is a more reliable metric of severity than number of freezing events for both clinical and objective measures. The large variability between clinicians suggests that caution should be used when comparing subjective ratings across centers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.03.001

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, T. R., Cho, C., Dilda, V., Shine, J. M., Naismith, S. L., Lewis, S. J. G., & Moore, S. T.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Moore, Steven T.
Venue
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
572-577
ISSN
1353-8020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160698760
Cited by
114
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC007658)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
freezing of gait, Parkinson's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Kinetocardiography, Locomotion, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Severity of Illness Index, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review