Cited by 74Neurological disorders and treatmentsContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMotor Control and Adaptation

Continuous in-home monitoring of essential tremor

Open access
Pulliam, C.L., Eichenseer, S.R., Goetz, C.G., Waln, O., Hunter, C.B., Jankovic, J., Vaillancourt, D.E., Giuffrida, J.P. +1 more·2014·Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Abstract

Background Essential tremor (ET) is typically measured in the clinic with subjective tremor rating scales which require the presence of a clinician for scoring and are not appropriate for measuring severity throughout the day. Motion sensors can accurately rate tremor severity during a set of predefined tasks in a laboratory.Methods We evaluated the ability of motion sensors to quantify tremor during unconstrained activities at home. 20 ET subjects wore a wireless sensor continuously for up to 10 h daily on two days and completed hourly standardized tremor assessments involving pre-defined tasks. Mathematical models were used to predict tremor rating scores from the sensor data.Results At home tremor scores from hourly standardized assessments correlated with at home tremor scores estimated during unconstrained activities immediately following the standardized assessments. The hourly standardized assessments did not significantly fluctuate throughout the day, while fluctuations in the continuous assessments tended to follow changes in voluntary activity level. Both types of tremor ratings (standardized and continuous) showed high day-to-day test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.67 to 0.90 for continuous ratings and 0.77 to 0.95 for standardized ratings.Conclusions Results demonstrate the feasibility of continuous monitoring of tremor severity at home, which should provide clinicians with a measure of the temporal pattern of tremor in the context of daily life and serve as a useful tool for the evaluation of novel anti-tremor medications in clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.09.009

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mobile technology could enable more frequent tremor assessments, and wearable technology could provide continuous tremor assessment.

    “While mobile technology could enable more frequent tremor assessments, wearable technology could provide continuous tremor assessment (106, 109).”
  • Several groups have utilized mobile and wearable technology to assess tremor severity in ET without using it for diagnostic purposes, but rather as a tool to monitor the evolution of symptoms over time.

    “Several groups have utilized mobile and wearable technology to assess tremor severity in ET without using it for diagnostic purposes [e.g., Ref. (105, 106)] but rather as a tool to monitor the evolution of symptoms over time.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pulliam, C. L., Eichenseer, S. R., Goetz, C. G., Waln, O., Hunter, C. B., Jankovic, J., Vaillancourt, D. E., Giuffrida, J. P., & Heldman, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies (United States) (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Pulliam, C.L.
Venue
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
37-40
ISSN
1353-8020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039477946
Cited by
74
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (2R44AG034708-02A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
essential tremor, tremor severity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biomechanical Phenomena, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Essential Tremor, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review