Cited by 294Biometric Identification and SecurityGait Recognition and AnalysisUser Authentication and Security Systems

Towards contactless palmprint recognition: A novel device, a new benchmark, and a collaborative representation based identification approach

Zhang, Lin, Li, Lida, Yang, Anqi, Shen, Ying, Yang, Meng·2017·Pattern Recognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.04.016

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, L., Li, L., Yang, A., Shen, Y., & Yang, M.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Lin
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
69
Pages
199-212
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606063865
Cited by
294
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
17.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of China (61672380)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
palmprint recognition, biometric authentication, benchmark dataset, image quality assessment, collaborative representation, low computational complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review