The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How deep learning extracts and learns leaf features for plant classification
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Plant identification systems developed by computer vision researchers have helped botanists to recognize and identify unknown plant species more rapidly. Hitherto, numerous studies have focused on procedures or algorithms that maximize the use of leaf databases for plant predictive modeling, but this results in leaf features which are liable to change with different leaf data and feature extraction techniques. In this paper, we learn useful leaf features directly from the raw representations of input data using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and gain intuition of the chosen features based on a Deconvolutional Network (DN) approach. We report somewhat unexpected results: (1) different orders of venation are the best representative features compared to those of outline shape, and (2) we observe multi-level representation in leaf data, demonstrating the hierarchical transformation of features from lower-level to higher-level abstraction, corresponding to species classes. We show that these findings fit with the hierarchical botanical definitions of leaf characters. Through these findings, we gained insights into the design of new hybrid feature extraction models which are able to further improve the discriminative power of plant classification systems. The source code and models are available at: https://github.com/cs-chan/Deep-Plant .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Large-Scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks
Karpathy, A., Toderici, G., Shetty, S., Leung, T., Sukthankar, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.223 · Cited by 6,354
Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations
Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 · Cited by 5,107
Cited by
Apple detection during different growth stages in orchards using the improved YOLO-V3 model
Tian, Y., Yang, G., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Li, E., & Liang, Z. (2019) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.012 · Cited by 1,043
New perspectives on plant disease characterization based on deep learning
Lee, S. H., Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., & Joly, A. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105220 · Cited by 348
Self-citationApplications of deep learning in precision weed management: A review
Rai, N., Zhang, Y., Ram, B. G., Schumacher, L., Yellavajjala, R. K., Bajwa, S., & Sun, X. (2023) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2023.107698 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S. H., Chan, C. S., Mayo, S. J., & Remagnino, P.
- Venue
- Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2616728375
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How deep learning extracts and learns leaf features for plant classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.05.015
- The paper
- Lee, S. H., Chan, C. S., Mayo, S. J., & Remagnino, P. (2017). How deep learning extracts and learns leaf features for plant classification. Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.05.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.