The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variable selection using random forests
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Liaw, A. I., & Wiener, M. C. (2007) · Cited by 18,594
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Jolliffe, I. T. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa501 · Cited by 14,522
Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.531 · Cited by 11,516
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling
Alizadeh, A. A., Eisen, M. B., Davis, R. E., Ma, C., Lossos, I. S., Rosenwald, A., Boldrick, J. C., Sabet, H., Tran, T., Yu, X., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35000501 · Cited by 9,925
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Kohavi, R., & John, G. H. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00043-x · Cited by 9,096
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
B, J. F. A., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,919
Ensemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408
An introduction to variable and feature selection
GuyonIsabelle, & ElisseeffAndré (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944968 · Cited by 8,354
The random subspace method for constructing decision forests
Ho, T. K. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.709601 · Cited by 7,005
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection.
Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003) · Cited by 6,576
Alon, U. S., Barkai, N., Notterman, D. A., Gish, K., Ybarra, S. E., Mack, D. H., & Levine, A. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.12.6745 · Cited by 4,170
Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution
Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A., Zeileis, A., & Hothorn, T. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-25 · Cited by 3,970
Conditional variable importance for random forests
Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., & Zeileis, A. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-307 · Cited by 3,467
Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest
Díaz‐Uriarte, R., & de Andrés, S. Á. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-3 · Cited by 3,013
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007607513941 · Cited by 2,996
Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models
Sobol, I. M. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,806
Sure Independence Screening for Ultrahigh Dimensional Feature Space
Fan, J., & Lv, J. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00674.x · Cited by 2,643
Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R : The Package relaimpo
Grömping, U. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v017.i01 · Cited by 2,615
Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior
Singh, D., Febbo, P. G., Ross, K. N., Jackson, D. G., Manola, J. B., Ladd, C., Tamayo, P., Renshaw, A. A., D'Amico, A. V., Richie, J. P., et al. (2002) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00030-2 · Cited by 2,516
Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures
Archer, K. J., & Kimes, R. (2007) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.08.015 · Cited by 1,162
Variable Importance Assessment in Regression: Linear Regression versus Random Forest
Grömping, U. (2009) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/tast.2009.08199 · Cited by 1,102
L 1-Regularization Path Algorithm for Generalized Linear Models
Park, M. Y., & Hastie, T. J. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00607.x · Cited by 859
Bishop, C. (2004) · Institute of Physics eBooks · doi:10.1887/0750303123/b365c43 · Cited by 859
Use of the zero norm with linear models and kernel methods
Weston, J., Elisseeff, A., Schölkopf, B., & Tipping, M. (2003) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · doi:10.5555/944919.944982 · Cited by 692
Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models
Sobol, I. M. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 644
Estimators of Relative Importance in Linear Regression Based on Variance Decomposition
Grömping, U. (2007) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313007x188252 · Cited by 643
Bühlmann, P., & Yu, B. (2002) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1031689014 · Cited by 635
Variable selection using svm based criteria
Rakotomamonjy, A. (2003) · doi:10.5555/944919.944977 · Cited by 616
Consistency of Random Forests and Other Averaging Classifiers
Gérard Biau, A., Devroye, L., & Lugosi, G. (2007) · Cited by 457
Random Forests: some methodological insightsPreprint
Genuer, R., Poggi, J., & Tuleau-Malot, C. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0811.3619 · Cited by 204
Self-citationCONSISTENCY FOR A SIMPLE MODEL OF RANDOM FORESTS
Breiman, L. (2004) · Cited by 165
Random Forests based feature selection for decoding fMRI data
Genuer, R., Michel, V., Eger, E., & Thirion, B. (2010) · HAL · Cited by 23
Self-citationGhattas, B., & Ishak, A. B. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 13
Classification supervisée en grande dimension. Application à l'agrément de conduite automobilePreprint
Poggi, J., & Tuleau-Malot, C. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1010.6227 · Cited by 10
Self-citationPartial and Recombined Estimators for Nonlinear Additive Models
Chèze, N., Poggi, J., & Portier, B. (2003) · Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes · doi:10.1023/a:1023940117323 · Cited by 9
Self-citationGene Selection and Classification
(2008) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789812790743_0007 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cutler, 2001, Pert – perfect random tree ensembles, Comput. Sci. Statist., 33, 490
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · Cited by 10,551
Biau, G., & Scornet, E. (2016) · Test · doi:10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 · Cited by 4,149
Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest
Probst, P., Wright, M. N., & Boulesteix, A. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1301 · Cited by 2,319
Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries
Gutiérrez, N. L., Hilborn, R. W., & Defeo, O. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09689 · Cited by 1,441
A review of feature selection methods with applications
Jović, A., Brkić, K., & Bogunovic, N. (2015) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.1109/mipro.2015.7160458 · Cited by 1,238
Metadata
- Authors
- Genuer, R., Poggi, J.-M., & Tuleau-Malot, C.
- Affiliations
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Laboratoire Jean-Alexandre Dieudonné (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Poggi, Jean-Michel
- Venue
- Pattern Recognition Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2225-2236
- ISSN
- 0167-8655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155261478
- Cited by
- 2,619
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 166 · 2025: 249 · 2024: 248 · 2023: 235 · 2022: 255 · 2021: 280 · 2020: 288 · 2019: 210 · 2018: 167 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 21.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Pattern Recognition Letters (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Keywords
- feature selection, random forest, feature importance, feature ranking, stepwise selection, classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review