Cited by 225Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Multimodal vehicle detection: fusing 3D-LIDAR and color camera data

Asvadi, Alireza, Garrote, Luis, Premebida, Cristiano, Peixoto, Paulo, J. Nunes, Urbano·2018·Pattern Recognition Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patrec.2017.09.038

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asvadi, A., Garrote, L., Premebida, C., Peixoto, P., & J. Nunes, U.
Affiliations
University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Asvadi, Alireza
Venue
Pattern Recognition Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
115
Pages
20-29
ISSN
0167-8655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2760327656
Cited by
225
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pattern Recognition Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
vehicle detection, multimodal fusion, 3D LiDAR, depth images, reflectance map, RGB camera, decision fusion, autonomous vehicles, sensor fusion, bounding box detection, KITTI dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review