Cited by 577Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Vehicle Detection from 3D Lidar Using Fully Convolutional Network

Open access
Li, Bo, Zhang, Tianlei, Xia, Tian·2016·Robotics: Science and Systems XII

Abstract

Convolutional network techniques have recently achieved great success in vision based detection tasks.This paper introduces the recent development of our research on transplanting the fully convolutional network technique to the detection tasks on 3D range scan data.Specifically, the scenario is set as the vehicle detection task from the range data of Velodyne 64E lidar.We proposes to present the data in a 2D point map and use a single 2D end-to-end fully convolutional network to predict the objectness confidence and the bounding boxes simultaneously.By carefully design the bounding box encoding, it is able to predict full 3D bounding boxes even using a 2D convolutional network.Experiments on the KITTI dataset shows the state-ofthe-art performance of the proposed method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15607/rss.2016.xii.042

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]4. Mark De Deuge, F Robotics, and Alastair Quadros. Unsupervised Feature Learning for Classification of Out- door 3D Scans. Araa.Asn.Au, pages 2-4, 2013.
  2. [22]22. Leonard Plotkin. Pydriver: Entwicklung eines frame- works für räumliche detektion und klassifikation von objekten in fahrzeugumgebung. Bachelor's thesis (Stu- dienarbeit), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, March 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, B., Zhang, T., & Xia, T.
Affiliations
Baidu (China) (CN)
Venue
Robotics: Science and Systems XII
Published
2016-06-27
OpenAlex
W2963083779
Cited by
577
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 2
FWCI
19.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
vehicle detection, 3D LiDAR, fully convolutional network, 3D bounding box regression, Velodyne VLP-16, KITTI dataset, point cloud object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review