Cited by 43Neural Networks and ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Neural algorithmic reasoning

Open access
Veličković, Petar, Blundell, Charles·2021·Patterns

Abstract

We present neural algorithmic reasoning-the art of building neural networks that are able to execute algorithmic computation-and provide our opinion on its transformative potential for running classical algorithms on inputs previously considered inaccessible to them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100273

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Python function tools are a more generic form of Chain-of-Thought, enhancing the overall utility and flexibility of the LLMs, as they can be used to solve questions that involve algorithmic reasoning ability.

    “Furthermore, the Python function tools are a more generic form of Chain-of-Thought, enhancing the overall utility and flexibility of the LLMs, as they can be used to solve questions that involve algorithmic reasoning ability (Veličković and Blundell, 2021).”

    From Large language models as tool makers (2023) · cites this paper as Veličković and Blundell, 2021

    The Main text and the blueprint of neural algorithmic reasoning discuss neural networks learning to execute algorithms, not Python function tools or LLMs. Searches for Chain-of-Thought, Python function tools, and LLM tool use found no passage addressing the claimed relationship or improvement in utility and flexibility. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Cormen T.H. Leiserson C.E. Rivest R.L. Stein C. Introduction to Algorithms 2009 MIT press
  2. [7]Veličković P. Buesing L. Matthew C Overlan, Razvan Pascanu, Oriol Vinyals, and Charles Blundell. Pointer Graph Networks arXiv 2020 arXiv:2006.06380 · arXiv
  3. [8]Veličković P. Ying R. Padovano M. Hadsell R. Blundell C. Neural execution of graph algorithms arXiv 2019 arXiv:1910.10593 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veličković, P., & Blundell, C.
Affiliations
Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Veličković, Petar
Venue
Patterns
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
2
Issue
7
Pages
100273
ISSN
2666-3899 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158330599
Cited by
39
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patterns (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
artificial neural networks, algorithmic computation, classical algorithms, intractable problems, computational complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review