Neural Turing Machines
Open accessAbstract
We extend the capabilities of neural networks by coupling them to external memory resources, which they can interact with by attentional processes. The combined system is analogous to a Turing Machine or Von Neumann architecture but is differentiable end-to-end, allowing it to be efficiently trained with gradient descent. Preliminary results demonstrate that Neural Turing Machines can infer simple algorithms such as copying, sorting, and associative recall from input and output examples.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cosine attention removes magnitude information, which could be meaningful in transformer embeddings.
“The Cosine Attention (Graves et al., 2014), using cosine similarity as the attention score between 𝑞 and 𝑘 , removes the magnitude info, which could be meaningful in transformer embeddings.”
From Can "consciousness" be observed from large language model (LLM) internal states? Dissecting LLM representations obtained from Theory of Mind test with Integrated Information Theory and Span Representation analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Graves et al., 2014
Section 3.3.1 (p. 8) says the Neural Turing Machine uses cosine similarity to compare key and memory vectors for content-based attention. That supports the cited mechanism, but our copy does not discuss magnitude information or whether it matters in transformer embeddings. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMemory-augmented neural networks (MemN2N, NTM, DNC) focus on algorithmic tasks rather than long-term personalization.
“MemN2N [20], NTM [21], and DNC [22] introduced differentiable external memory for neural networks. However, these focus on algorithmic tasks rather than long-term personalization.”
From From Goldfish to Elephant: Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models via Selective Storage and Hierarchical Compression (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Earlier work introduced end-to-end trainable memory layers and incorporated them into neural computational systems.
“Earlier works introduced end-to-end trainable memory layers (Sukhbaatar et al., 2015) and incorporated them as part of neural computational systems (Graves et al., 2014).”
From Memory Layers at Scale (2024) · cites this paper as Graves et al., 2014
The survey by Savya et al. provides a broader analysis of neural network models, including Transformers and Neural Turing Machines, and examines the implications of human memory theories, such as the Atkinson-Shiffrin Model, for AI memory.
“The survey by Savya et al. [54] provides a broader analysis of neural network models, including Transformers [3] and Neural Turing Machines [55], and examines the implications of human memory theories, such as the Atkinson-Shiffrin Model [6], for AI memory.”
From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
NTMs combined end-to-end differentiable controllers with an external memory matrix, enabling read and write operations via differentiable attention mechanisms.
“Graves et al. (2014) introduced Neural Turing Machines (NTMs), which combined end-to-end differentiable controllers with an external memory matrix, enabling read and write operations via differentiable attention mechanisms.”
From Memory Fabric for Conversational AI Agents: Enabling Shared and Persistent Memory Across Users (2025) · cites this paper as Graves et al. (2014)
NTMs could learn simple algorithms such as copying and sorting, showing the feasibility of learned read/write operations.
“Their experiments demonstrated that NTMs could learn simple algorithms such as copying and sorting, showing the feasibility of learned read/write operations.”
From Memory Fabric for Conversational AI Agents: Enabling Shared and Persistent Memory Across Users (2025) · cites this paper as Graves et al. (2014)
Memory augmentation extends the transformer framework by incorporating external storage modules inspired by Neural Turing Machines and Differentiable Neural Computers, which decouple memory capacity from model parameters.
“Memory augmentation extends this framework by incorporating external storage modules inspired by Neural Turing Machines and Differentiable Neural Computers, which decouple memory capacity from model parameters28.”
Architectures for memory-like functions have led to meaningful improvements in capabilities.
“Architectures for incorporating different kinds of memorylike functions have led in the past to meaningful improvements in capabilities.”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Memory-augmented networks have not fully addressed the need for a reliable and adaptable long-term memory function in LLMs.
“Despite showing potential, these methods have not fully addressed the need for a reliable and adaptable long-term memory function in LLMs.”
From MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memory (2023) · cites this paper as Graves et al., 2014
The Abstract (p. 1) reports preliminary success on simple tasks, and §4 Experiments (p. 10) says the networks’ memory was reset between episodes. Neither passage assesses whether memory-augmented methods provide reliable, adaptable long-term memory in LLMs; a search for that limitation found no such assessment in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · see citing works
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 · Cited by 4,022 · see citing works
The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks
Rigotti, M., Barak, O., Warden, M. R., Wang, X.-J., Daw, N. D., Miller, E. K., & Fusi, S. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12160 · Cited by 1,639 · see citing works
Smolensky, P. (1990) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90007-m · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Banishing the homunculus: Making working memory work
Hazy, T. E., Frank, M. J., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.067 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M., and Anderson, M. (2009). Memory . Psychology Press.
- Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. abs/1409.0473. · arXiv
- Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., and Camos, V. (2004). Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 133(1):83.
- Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of language. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on , 2(3):113-124.
- Das, S., Giles, C. L., and Sun, G.-Z. (1992). Learning context-free grammars: Capabilities and limitations of a recurrent neural network with an external stack memory. In Proceedings of The Fourteenth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society. Indiana University .
- Dayan, P. (2008). Simple substrates for complex cognition. Frontiers in neuroscience , 2(2):255.
- Eliasmith, C. (2013). How to build a brain: A neural architecture for biological cognition . Oxford University Press.
- Fitch, W., Hauser, M. D., and Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition , 97(2):179-210.
- Frasconi, P., Gori, M., and Sperduti, A. (1998). A general framework for adaptive processing of data structures. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on , 9(5):768-786.
- Gallistel, C. R. and King, A. P. (2009). Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience , volume 3. John Wiley & Sons.
- Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1995). Cellular basis of working memory. Neuron , 14(3):477-485.
- Graves, A. (2013). Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850 . · arXiv
- Graves, A. and Jaitly, N. (2014). Towards end-to-end speech recognition with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14) , pages 1764-1772.
- Graves, A., Mohamed, A., and Hinton, G. (2013). Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013 IEEE International Conference on , pages 6645-6649. IEEE.
- Hadley, R. F. (2009). The problem of rapid variable creation. Neural computation , 21(2):510-532.
- Hinton, G. E. (1986). Learning distributed representations of concepts. In Proceedings of the eighth annual conference of the cognitive science society , volume 1, page 12. Amherst, MA.
- Hochreiter, S., Younger, A. S., and Conwell, P. R. (2001b). Learning to learn using gradient descent. In Artificial Neural Networks?ICANN 2001 , pages 87-94. Springer.
- Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , 79(8):25542558.
- Jackendoff, R. and Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (reply to fitch, hauser, and chomsky). Cognition , 97(2):211225.
- Kanerva, P. (2009). Hyperdimensional computing: An introduction to computing in distributed representation with high-dimensional random vectors. Cognitive Computation , 1(2):139-159.
- Marcus, G. F. (2003). The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science . MIT press.
- Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review , 63(2):81.
- Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in cognitive sciences , 7(3):141-144.
- Murphy, K. P. (2012). Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective . MIT press.
- Pollack, J. B. (1990). Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence , 46(1):77-105.
- Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., Group, P. R., et al. (1986). Parallel distributed processing , volume 1. MIT press.
- Seung, H. S. (1998). Continuous attractors and oculomotor control. Neural Networks , 11(7):1253-1258.
- Siegelmann, H. T. and Sontag, E. D. (1995). On the computational power of neural nets. Journal of computer and system sciences , 50(1):132-150.
- Socher, R., Huval, B., Manning, C. D., and Ng, A. Y. (2012). Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning , pages 1201-1211. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Sutskever, I., Martens, J., and Hinton, G. E. (2011). Generating text with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11) , pages 1017-1024.
- Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., and Le, Q. V . (2014). Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.3215 . · arXiv
- Touretzky, D. S. (1990). Boltzcons: Dynamic symbol structures in a connectionist network. Artificial Intelligence , 46(1):5-46.
- Wang, X.-J. (1999). Synaptic basis of cortical persistent activity: the importance of nmda receptors to working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience , 19(21):9587-9603.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine learning for molecular and materials science
Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 · Cited by 4,968 · see citing works
Transformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context
Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Le, Q., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1285 · Cited by 3,169 · see citing works
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550 · see citing works
Reading Wikipedia to answer open-domain questions
Chen, D., Fisch, A., Weston, J., & Bordes, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1171 · Cited by 1,546 · see citing works
A clinically applicable approach to continuous prediction of future acute kidney injury
Tomašev, N., Glorot, X., Rae, J. W., Zielinski, M., Askham, H., Saraiva, A., Mottram, A., Meyer, C., Ravuri, S., Protsyuk, I., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1390-1 · Cited by 1,086 · see citing works
Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Multimodal intelligence: Representation learning, information fusion, and applications
Zhang, C., Yang, Z., He, X., & Deng, L. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.2987728 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Continuous-variable quantum neural networks
Killoran, N., Bromley, T. R., Arrazola, J. M., Schuld, M., Quesada, N., & Lloyd, S. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033063 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
AI-based personalized E-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions
Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3193938 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Heterogeneous Memory Enhanced Multimodal Attention Model for Video Question Answering
Fan, C., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Wang, W., Zhang, C., & Huang, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00210 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
The neuroconnectionist research programme
Doerig, A., Sommers, R. P., Seeliger, K., Richards, B., Ismael, J., Lindsay, G. W., Kording, K. P., Konkle, T., van Gerven, M. A. J., Kriegeskorte, N., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00705-w · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Hopfield Networks is All You Need
Ramsauer, H., Schäfl, B., Lehner, J., Seidl, P., Widrich, M., Adler, T., Gruber, L., Holzleitner, M., Pavlović, M., Sandve, G. K., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02217 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Do NLP Models Know Numbers? Probing Numeracy in Embeddings
Wallace, E., Wang, Y., Li, S., Singh, S., & Gardner, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1534 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Cultural Schemas: What They Are, How to Find Them, and What to Do Once You’ve Caught One
Boutyline, A., & Soter, L. K. (2021) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224211024525 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
MART: Memory-Augmented Recurrent Transformer for Coherent Video Paragraph Captioning
Lei, J., Wang, L., Shen, Y., Yu, D., Berg, T., & Bansal, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.233 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Pan-Peptide Meta Learning for T-cell receptor–antigen binding recognition
Gao, Y., Gao, Y., Fan, Y., Zhu, C., Wei, Z., Zhou, C., Chuai, G., Chen, Q., Zhang, H., & Liu, Q. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00619-3 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience
Marblestone, A. H., Wayne, G., & Kording, K. P. (2016) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2016.00094 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationStructured Scene Memory for Vision-Language Navigation
Wang, H., Wang, W., Liang, W., Xiong, C., & Shen, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00835 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Symbol Emergence in Cognitive Developmental Systems: A Survey
Taniguchi, T., Piater, J., Worgotter, F., Ugur, E., Hoffmann, M., Jamone, L., Nagai, T., Rosman, B., Matsuka, T., Iwahashi, N., et al. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2018.2867772 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
Allamanis, M., Barr, E. T., Devanbu, P., & Sutton, C. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3212695 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Casares, A. P. (2018) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.05.002 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
One model for the learning of language
Yang, Y., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2021865119 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Veličković, P., & Blundell, C. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100273 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Visual Semantic Information Pursuit: A Survey
Liu, D., Bober, M., & Kittler, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2950025 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Time
Behrouz, A., Zhong, P., & Mirrokni, V. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.00663 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Memory has always been one of the core parts of the neural network designs [76, 12, 77, 32].”
Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models
Nye, M., Andreassen, A. J., Gur-Ari, G., Michalewski, H., Austin, J., Bieber, D., Dohan, D., Lewkowycz, A., Bosma, M., Luan, D., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.00114 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memory
Zhong, W., Guo, L., Gao, Q., Ye, H., & Wang, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10250 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“Memory-augmented networks (MANNs) (Meng & Huang, 2018; Graves et al., 2014) like Neural Turing Machines (NTMs)(Graves et al., 2014) is an example of this, designed to increase the memory capacity of neural networks.”
BackgroundInfluentialChatDB: Augmenting LLMs with Databases as Their Symbolic Memory
Hu, C., Fu, J., Du, C., Luo, S., Zhao, J., & Zhao, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03901 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Matrix-based memory employs additional trainable memory tokens (Bulatov et al., 2022, 2023) or trainable memory matrices (Graves et al., 2014).”
BackgroundRULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?
Hsieh, C.-P., Sun, S., Kriman, S., Acharya, S., Rekesh, D., Jia, F., Zhang, Y., & Ginsburg, B. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learning
Ahn, K., Cheng, X., Daneshmand, H., & Sra, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00297 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Graves et al. (2014) design an alternative neural architecture known as the neural Turing machine , building on attention layers introduced by Hochreiter and Schmidhuber (1997).”
MethodBABILong: Testing the Limits of LLMs with Long Context Reasoning-in-a-Haystack
Kuratov, Y., Bulatov, A., Anokhin, P., Rodkin, I., Sorokin, D., Sorokin, A., & Burtsev, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10149 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Recurrence is another mechanism to deal with long context (Graves et al., 2014; Voelker et al., 2019; Sorokin et al., 2022).”
Irie, K., Csordás, R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.05798 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…gain in expressing the dual form in terms of key-value/attention concepts (Vaswani et al., 2017; Miller et al., 2016; Sukhbaatar et al., 2015; Graves et al., 2014), such a formulation has become very popular since the advent of Transformers (Vaswani et al., 2017), and we believe many modern…”
BackgroundSemi-supervised multimodal representation learning through a global workspace
Devillers, B., Maytié, L., & VanRullen, R. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3416701 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
NoLiMa: Long-Context Evaluation Beyond Literal Matching
Modarressi, A., Deilamsalehy, H., Dernoncourt, F., Bui, T., Rossi, R. A., Yoon, S., & Schütze, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.05167 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“This broader category, termed association recall tasks, has been extensively studied in machine learning (Graves et al., 2014; Ba et al., 2016).”
Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated
DeChant, C. (2025) · 2025 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml64287.2025.00024 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Zoology: Measuring and Improving Recall in Efficient Language Models
Arora, S., Eyuboglu, S., Timalsina, A., Johnson, I., Poli, M., Zou, J., Rudra, A., & Ré, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.04927 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory
He, Z., Lin, W., Zheng, H., Zhang, F., Jones, M. W., Aitchison, L., Xu, X., Liu, M., Kristensson, P. O., & Shen, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00489 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The survey by Savya et al. [54] provides a broader analysis of neural network models, including Transformers [3] and Neural Turing Machines [55], and examines the implications of human memory theories, such as the Atkinson-Shiffrin Model [6], for AI memory.”
Tomašev, N., Glorot, X., Rae, J. W., Zielinski, M., Askham, H., Saraiva, A., Mottram, A., Meyer, C., Ravuri, S., Protsyuk, I., et al. (2019) · doi:10.21203/rs.2.10083/v1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Li, J. (2025) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100163 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Berges, V.-P., Oğuz, B., Haziza, D., Yih, W.-T., Zettlemoyer, L., & Ghosh, G. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.09764 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Earlier works introduced end-to-end trainable memory layers (Sukhbaatar et al., 2015) and incorporated them as part of neural computational systems (Graves et al., 2014).”
Memory for Autonomous LLM Agents:Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Emerging Frontiers
Du, P. (2026) · arXiv · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Neural Turing Machines [Graves et al., 2014] and Differentiable Neural Computers [Graves et al., 2016] pushed further, supporting both content-based and location-based addressing over a memory matrix.”
Selective Forgetting: A Graph-Based Memory Framework for Long-Term LLM Agents
Rusu, T., Khanzadeh, S., & Alalfi, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.28978
“Early differentiable architectures such as Neural Turing Machines Graves et al. [2014] and End-to-End Memory Networks Sukhbaatar et al. [2015] coupled a controller with an addressable external store, establishing the read/write abstraction that later memory systems inherit.”
Kummara, H. (2026) · Cambridge Open Engage (preprint) · doi:10.33774/coe-2026-xpkvb
Memory Fabric for Conversational AI Agents: Enabling Shared and Persistent Memory Across Users
Tiwari, A., & Gupta, V. (2025) · TechRxiv · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.176523350.08289935/v1
Zhou, S., & Li, Q. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-31685-9
Dynamic Cheatsheet: Test-Time Learning with Adaptive Memory
Suzgun, M., Yuksekgonul, M., Bianchi, F., Jurafsky, D., & Zou, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.07952
On The Statistical Limits of Self-Improving Agents
Wang, C. L., Dorchen, K., & Jin, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04399
- Authors
- Graves, A., Wayne, G., & Danihelka, I.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1410.5401
- OpenAlex
- W2167839676
- Cited by
- 1,058
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 119 · 2018: 127 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Keywords
- neural Turing machines, external memory, attention, end-to-end learning, algorithm learning, copying, sorting, associative recall, artificial neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
